The Position of the Artificial Intelligence Among the Elements of the Legal Relationship
Abstract
The development of artificial intelligence necessitates the legal regulation of social relations associated with the use of new technologies. Today, fragmented regulatory regulation is noted in Russian law, expressed, as the rule, in strategic documents in which artificial intelligence technologies are reflected as cross-cutting technologies that contribute to the development of the digital economy.
The purpose of this work is to determine the place of artificial intelligence among the elements of legal relations, which is seen as necessary for building the model of legal regulation of artificial intelligence.
The research methodology is based on the set of methods of scientific knowledge, including abstract logical, formal legal and the method of correlation analysis.
The article analyzes approaches to determining the place of artificial intelligence in the structure of legal relations. The scientific discussion is that some authors attribute artificial intelligence to the variety of objects of legal regulation; other authors admit that it is possible to consider artificial intelligence as the specific subject of law.
As the result of research, the authors come to the conclusion that today artificial intelligence should be classified as the type of objects of legal regulation.
In conclusion, the work also evaluates the possibilities and measures of the participation of artificial intelligence in legal activities. The authors come to the conclusion that today the cognitive potential of artificial intelligence has not yet reached the level of development that allowed it to repeat the thought processes of the lawyer in resolving the legal dispute. At the same time, artificial intelligence has tremendous potential to become the irreplaceable technological “assistant” for the lawyer, contributing to the improvement of the quality and efficiency of legal services.
The purpose of this work is to determine the place of artificial intelligence among the elements of legal relations, which is seen as necessary for building the model of legal regulation of artificial intelligence.
The research methodology is based on the set of methods of scientific knowledge, including abstract logical, formal legal and the method of correlation analysis.
The article analyzes approaches to determining the place of artificial intelligence in the structure of legal relations. The scientific discussion is that some authors attribute artificial intelligence to the variety of objects of legal regulation; other authors admit that it is possible to consider artificial intelligence as the specific subject of law.
As the result of research, the authors come to the conclusion that today artificial intelligence should be classified as the type of objects of legal regulation.
In conclusion, the work also evaluates the possibilities and measures of the participation of artificial intelligence in legal activities. The authors come to the conclusion that today the cognitive potential of artificial intelligence has not yet reached the level of development that allowed it to repeat the thought processes of the lawyer in resolving the legal dispute. At the same time, artificial intelligence has tremendous potential to become the irreplaceable technological “assistant” for the lawyer, contributing to the improvement of the quality and efficiency of legal services.
About the Authors
Anton A. Vasiliev
Altai State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anton A. Vasiliev — Dr. Sci. in Law, Associate Professor, Head of the Faculty of Law, and Department of Theory and History of State and Law
68, ave. Socialistichesky, Barnaul, Altai Region, 656049
Yulia V. Pechatnova
Altai State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yulia V. Pechatnova — Master’s student
68, ave. Socialistichesky, Barnaul, Altai Region, 656049
References
1. Calo, R. (2015). Robotics and the lessons of cyberlaw. California Law Review, 103(3), 513–563.
2. Larina, E. S., & Ovchinskij, V. S. (2018). Iskusstvennyj intellekt. Bol’shie dannye. Prestupnost’ [Artificial intelligence. Big data. Crime]. Knizhnyj mir.
3. Vasil’ev, A. A., & Shpoper, D. (2018). Iskusstvennyj intellekt: Pravovye aspekty [Artificial intelligence: Legal aspects]. Izvestia ASU, 6(104), 23–26. https://doi.org/10.14258/izvasu(2018)6-03
4. Laptev, V. A. (2019). Ponyatie iskusstvennogo intellekta i yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost’ za ego rabotu [The concept of artificial intelligence and legal responsibility for its work]. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey Shkoly Ekonomiki, (2), 79–102. https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2019.2.79.102
5. Morhat, P. M. (2018). K voprosu o pravosub”ektnosti “elektronnogo lica” [On the issue of legal personality of an “electronic person”]. Legal Studies, (4), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-7136.2018.4.25647
6. Cukanova, E. Yu., & Skopenko, O. R. (2018). Pravovye aspekty otvetstvennosti za prichinenie vreda robotom s iskusstvennym intellektom [Legal aspects of liability for harm caused by a robot with artificial intelligence]. Voprosy Rossijskogo i Mezhdunarodnogo Prava, 8(2А), 42–48.
7. Golubcov, V. (2019). Rossijskaya Federaciya kak sub”ekt grazhdanskogo prava [The Russian Federation as a subject of civil law]. Statute.
8. Andreev, Yu. N. (2005). Uchastie gosudarstva v grazhdansko-pravovyh otnosheniyah [Participation of the state in civil law relations]. Yurid. Centr Press.
9. Schirmer, J.–E. (2019). Artificial intelligence and legal personality: Introducing “Teilrechtsfähigkeit”: A partial legal status made in Germany. Regulating Artificial Intelligence, 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32361-5_6
10. Shestak, V. A., & Volevodz, A. G. (2019). Sovremennye potrebnosti pravovogo obespecheniya iskusstvennogo intellekta: Vzglyad iz Rossii [Modern requirements of the legal support of artificial intelligence: A view from Russia]. Russian Journal of Criminology, 13(2), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.17150/2500-4255.2019.13(2).197-206
11. Malyshkin, A. V. (2019) Integrirovanie iskusstvennogo intellekta v obshchestvennuyu zhizn’: Nekotorye eticheskie i pravovye problemy [Integration of artificial intelligence into public life: Some ethical and legal problems]. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law, 10(3), 444–460. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2019.303
12. Campbell, H. A., & Garner, S. (2016). Networked theology: Negotiating faith in digital culture. Baker Academic.
13. Asaro, P. (2007). Robots and responsibility from a legal perspective. Proceedings of the IEEE, 4(14), 20–24.
14. Begishev, I. R., Latypova, E. Yu., & Kirpichnikov, D. V. (2020). Iskusstvennyj intellekt kak pravovaya kategoriya: Doktrinal’nyj podhod k razrabotke definicii [Artificial intelligence as the legal category: Doctrinal approach to developing the definition]. Aktual’nye Problemy Ekonomiki i Prava, 14(1), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.21202/1993-047X.14.2020.1.79-91
15. Buchanan, B. G., & Headrick, T. E. (1970). Some speculation about artificial intelligence and legal reasoning. Stanford Law Review, 23(1), 40–62. https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/journal_articles/867
16. Gadzhiev, G. A. (2018). Yavlyaetsya li robot-agent licom? (Poisk pravovyh form dlya regulirovaniya cifrovoj ekonomiki) [Whether the robot-agent is a person? (Search of legal forms for the regulation of digital economy)]. Journal of Russian Law, (1), 15-30. https://doi.org/10.12737/art_2018_1_2
17. Zaplatina, T. S. (2019). Iskusstvennyj intellekt v voprose vyneseniya sudebnyh reshenij, ili II-sud’ya [Artificial intellect in the passing sentences issues or AI judge]. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL), (4), 160–168. https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2019.56.4.160-168
18. Cherkasov, V. N. (2017). Novyj sub”ekt prava? [A new subject of law?]. Bazis, 1(1), 41–44.
19. Somenkov, S. A. (2019). Iskusstvennyj intellekt: Ot ob”ekta k sub”ektu? [Artificial intelligence: From object to subject?]. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL), (2), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2019.54.2.075-085
Views: 416
Email this article 