dirightDigital Law JournalЦифровое право2686-9136Maxim Inozemtsev10.38044/2686-9136-2020-1-4-74-83diright-34Research ArticleARTICLESСТАТЬИThe Position of the Artificial Intelligence Among the Elements of the Legal RelationshipМесто искусственного интеллекта среди элементов состава правоотношенияhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3122-531XВасильевА. А.VasilievAnton A.

Васильев А.А. — доктор юридических наук, профессор, директор юридического института, заведующий кафедрой теории и истории государства и права 

656049, Алтайский край, Барнаул, пр-кт Социалистический, 68

Anton A. Vasiliev — Dr. Sci. in Law, Associate Professor, Head of the Faculty of Law, and Department of Theory and History of State and Law 

68, ave. Socialistichesky, Barnaul, Altai Region, 656049

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3091-990XПечатноваЮ. В.PechatnovaYulia V.

Печатнова Ю.В. — магистрант юридического института 

656049, Алтайский край, Барнаул, пр-кт Социалистический, 68

Yulia V. Pechatnova — Master’s student 

68, ave. Socialistichesky, Barnaul, Altai Region, 656049

jp_0707@mail.ruАлтайский государственный университетРоссияAltai State UniversityRussian Federation202030122020147483Copyright © Vasiliev A.A., Pechatnova Y.V., 20202020Васильев А.А., Печатнова Ю.В.Vasiliev A.A., Pechatnova Y.V.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.digitallawjournal.org/jour/article/view/34

The development of artificial intelligence necessitates the legal regulation of social relations associated with the use of new technologies. Today, fragmented regulatory regulation is noted in Russian law, expressed, as the rule, in strategic documents in which artificial intelligence technologies are reflected as cross-cutting technologies that contribute to the development of the digital economy. The purpose of this work is to determine the place of artificial intelligence among the elements of legal relations, which is seen as necessary for building the model of legal regulation of artificial intelligence. The research methodology is based on the set of methods of scientific knowledge, including abstract logical, formal legal and the method of correlation analysis. The article analyzes approaches to determining the place of artificial intelligence in the structure of legal relations. The scientific discussion is that some authors attribute artificial intelligence to the variety of objects of legal regulation; other authors admit that it is possible to consider artificial intelligence as the specific subject of law. As the result of research, the authors come to the conclusion that today artificial intelligence should be classified as the type of objects of legal regulation. In conclusion, the work also evaluates the possibilities and measures of the participation of artificial intelligence in legal activities. The authors come to the conclusion that today the cognitive potential of artificial intelligence has not yet reached the level of development that allowed it to repeat the thought processes of the lawyer in resolving the legal dispute. At the same time, artificial intelligence has tremendous potential to become the irreplaceable technological “assistant” for the lawyer, contributing to the improvement of the quality and efficiency of legal services.

Развитие искусственного интеллекта вызывает необходимость правового регулирования общественных отношений, связанных с применением новых технологий. На сегодняшний день в российском законодательстве отмечается фрагментарное нормативное регулирование, выраженное, как правило, в стратегических документах, где технологии искусственного интеллекта отражаются как сквозные, способствующие развитию цифровой экономики. Цель настоящей работы — определение места искусственного интеллекта среди элементов состава правоотношения, что видится необходимым для построения модели правового регулирования искусственного интеллекта. В статье проведен анализ подходов к определению места искусственного интеллекта в структуре правоотношения. Научная дискуссия состоит в том, что одни авторы относят искусственный интеллект к разновидности объектов правового регулирования; другие авторы допускают возможность рассматривать искусственный интеллект в качестве специфического субъекта права. В результате проведенного исследования авторы приходят выводу о том, что на сегодняшний день искусственный интеллект следует относить к разновидности объектов правового регулирования. В заключение работы также дается оценка возможности и меры участия искусственного интеллекта в юридической деятельности. В настоящее время когнитивный потенциал искусственного интеллекта еще не достиг того уровня развития, который позволил бы ему повторить мыслительные процессы юриста при решении правового спора. Вместе с тем, искусственный интеллект имеет колоссальный потенциал стать незаменимым технологичным «помощником» юриста, способствующим улучшению качества и эффективности оказания юридических услуг.

искусственный интеллектроботыправовое регулированиецифровое правокибербезопасностьartificial intelligencerobotslegal regulationdigital lawcybersecurityReferencesCalo, R. (2015). Robotics and the lessons of cyberlaw. California Law Review, 103(3), 513–563.Calo, R. (2015). Robotics and the lessons of cyberlaw. California Law Review, 103(3), 513–563.Larina, E. S., & Ovchinskij, V. S. (2018). Iskusstvennyj intellekt. Bol’shie dannye. Prestupnost’ [Artificial intelligence. Big data. Crime]. Knizhnyj mir.Larina, E. S., & Ovchinskij, V. S. (2018). Iskusstvennyj intellekt. Bol’shie dannye. Prestupnost’ [Artificial intelligence. Big data. Crime]. Knizhnyj mir.Vasil’ev, A. A., & Shpoper, D. (2018). Iskusstvennyj intellekt: Pravovye aspekty [Artificial intelligence: Legal aspects]. Izvestia ASU, 6(104), 23–26. https://doi.org/10.14258/izvasu(2018)6-03Vasil’ev, A. A., & Shpoper, D. (2018). Iskusstvennyj intellekt: Pravovye aspekty [Artificial intelligence: Legal aspects]. Izvestia ASU, 6(104), 23–26. https://doi.org/10.14258/izvasu(2018)6-03Laptev, V. A. (2019). Ponyatie iskusstvennogo intellekta i yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost’ za ego rabotu [The concept of artificial intelligence and legal responsibility for its work]. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey Shkoly Ekonomiki, (2), 79–102. https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2019.2.79.102Laptev, V. A. (2019). Ponyatie iskusstvennogo intellekta i yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost’ za ego rabotu [The concept of artificial intelligence and legal responsibility for its work]. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey Shkoly Ekonomiki, (2), 79–102. https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2019.2.79.102Morhat, P. M. (2018). K voprosu o pravosub”ektnosti “elektronnogo lica” [On the issue of legal personality of an “electronic person”]. Legal Studies, (4), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-7136.2018.4.25647Morhat, P. M. (2018). K voprosu o pravosub”ektnosti “elektronnogo lica” [On the issue of legal personality of an “electronic person”]. Legal Studies, (4), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-7136.2018.4.25647Cukanova, E. Yu., & Skopenko, O. R. (2018). Pravovye aspekty otvetstvennosti za prichinenie vreda robotom s iskusstvennym intellektom [Legal aspects of liability for harm caused by a robot with artificial intelligence]. Voprosy Rossijskogo i Mezhdunarodnogo Prava, 8(2А), 42–48.Cukanova, E. Yu., & Skopenko, O. R. (2018). Pravovye aspekty otvetstvennosti za prichinenie vreda robotom s iskusstvennym intellektom [Legal aspects of liability for harm caused by a robot with artificial intelligence]. Voprosy Rossijskogo i Mezhdunarodnogo Prava, 8(2А), 42–48.Golubcov, V. (2019). Rossijskaya Federaciya kak sub”ekt grazhdanskogo prava [The Russian Federation as a subject of civil law]. Statute.Golubcov, V. (2019). Rossijskaya Federaciya kak sub”ekt grazhdanskogo prava [The Russian Federation as a subject of civil law]. Statute.Andreev, Yu. N. (2005). Uchastie gosudarstva v grazhdansko-pravovyh otnosheniyah [Participation of the state in civil law relations]. Yurid. Centr Press.Andreev, Yu. N. (2005). Uchastie gosudarstva v grazhdansko-pravovyh otnosheniyah [Participation of the state in civil law relations]. Yurid. Centr Press.Schirmer, J.–E. (2019). Artificial intelligence and legal personality: Introducing “Teilrechtsfähigkeit”: A partial legal status made in Germany. Regulating Artificial Intelligence, 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32361-5_6Schirmer, J.–E. (2019). Artificial intelligence and legal personality: Introducing “Teilrechtsfähigkeit”: A partial legal status made in Germany. Regulating Artificial Intelligence, 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32361-5_6Shestak, V. A., & Volevodz, A. G. (2019). Sovremennye potrebnosti pravovogo obespecheniya iskusstvennogo intellekta: Vzglyad iz Rossii [Modern requirements of the legal support of artificial intelligence: A view from Russia]. Russian Journal of Criminology, 13(2), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.17150/2500-4255.2019.13(2).197-206Shestak, V. A., & Volevodz, A. G. (2019). Sovremennye potrebnosti pravovogo obespecheniya iskusstvennogo intellekta: Vzglyad iz Rossii [Modern requirements of the legal support of artificial intelligence: A view from Russia]. Russian Journal of Criminology, 13(2), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.17150/2500-4255.2019.13(2).197-206Malyshkin, A. V. (2019) Integrirovanie iskusstvennogo intellekta v obshchestvennuyu zhizn’: Nekotorye eticheskie i pravovye problemy [Integration of artificial intelligence into public life: Some ethical and legal problems]. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law, 10(3), 444–460. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2019.303Malyshkin, A. V. (2019) Integrirovanie iskusstvennogo intellekta v obshchestvennuyu zhizn’: Nekotorye eticheskie i pravovye problemy [Integration of artificial intelligence into public life: Some ethical and legal problems]. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law, 10(3), 444–460. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2019.303Campbell, H. A., & Garner, S. (2016). Networked theology: Negotiating faith in digital culture. Baker Academic.Campbell, H. A., & Garner, S. (2016). Networked theology: Negotiating faith in digital culture. Baker Academic.Asaro, P. (2007). Robots and responsibility from a legal perspective. Proceedings of the IEEE, 4(14), 20–24.Asaro, P. (2007). Robots and responsibility from a legal perspective. Proceedings of the IEEE, 4(14), 20–24.Begishev, I. R., Latypova, E. Yu., & Kirpichnikov, D. V. (2020). Iskusstvennyj intellekt kak pravovaya kategoriya: Doktrinal’nyj podhod k razrabotke definicii [Artificial intelligence as the legal category: Doctrinal approach to developing the definition]. Aktual’nye Problemy Ekonomiki i Prava, 14(1), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.21202/1993-047X.14.2020.1.79-91Begishev, I. R., Latypova, E. Yu., & Kirpichnikov, D. V. (2020). Iskusstvennyj intellekt kak pravovaya kategoriya: Doktrinal’nyj podhod k razrabotke definicii [Artificial intelligence as the legal category: Doctrinal approach to developing the definition]. Aktual’nye Problemy Ekonomiki i Prava, 14(1), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.21202/1993-047X.14.2020.1.79-91Buchanan, B. G., & Headrick, T. E. (1970). Some speculation about artificial intelligence and legal reasoning. Stanford Law Review, 23(1), 40–62. https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/journal_articles/867Buchanan, B. G., & Headrick, T. E. (1970). Some speculation about artificial intelligence and legal reasoning. Stanford Law Review, 23(1), 40–62. https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/journal_articles/867Gadzhiev, G. A. (2018). Yavlyaetsya li robot-agent licom? (Poisk pravovyh form dlya regulirovaniya cifrovoj ekonomiki) [Whether the robot-agent is a person? (Search of legal forms for the regulation of digital economy)]. Journal of Russian Law, (1), 15-30. https://doi.org/10.12737/art_2018_1_2Gadzhiev, G. A. (2018). Yavlyaetsya li robot-agent licom? (Poisk pravovyh form dlya regulirovaniya cifrovoj ekonomiki) [Whether the robot-agent is a person? (Search of legal forms for the regulation of digital economy)]. Journal of Russian Law, (1), 15-30. https://doi.org/10.12737/art_2018_1_2Zaplatina, T. S. (2019). Iskusstvennyj intellekt v voprose vyneseniya sudebnyh reshenij, ili II-sud’ya [Artificial intellect in the passing sentences issues or AI judge]. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL), (4), 160–168. https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2019.56.4.160-168Zaplatina, T. S. (2019). Iskusstvennyj intellekt v voprose vyneseniya sudebnyh reshenij, ili II-sud’ya [Artificial intellect in the passing sentences issues or AI judge]. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL), (4), 160–168. https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2019.56.4.160-168Cherkasov, V. N. (2017). Novyj sub”ekt prava? [A new subject of law?]. Bazis, 1(1), 41–44.Cherkasov, V. N. (2017). Novyj sub”ekt prava? [A new subject of law?]. Bazis, 1(1), 41–44.Somenkov, S. A. (2019). Iskusstvennyj intellekt: Ot ob”ekta k sub”ektu? [Artificial intelligence: From object to subject?]. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL), (2), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2019.54.2.075-085Somenkov, S. A. (2019). Iskusstvennyj intellekt: Ot ob”ekta k sub”ektu? [Artificial intelligence: From object to subject?]. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL), (2), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2019.54.2.075-085

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.