Legal regime of account: Approaches to defining a virtual object of law

This article examines issues that have been insufficiently developed in Russian jurisprudence concerning the legal nature of accounts in information systems (on the example of social networks) and the legal status of persons who have a legitimate interest in protecting their accounts. In practice, various terms such as “user”, “owner”, “participant”, “rights holder”, “proprietor”, etc. are used to refer to the entity that controls an account, which serves as a common type of virtual object. In setting out to formulate a scientifically sound conclusion about the legal rights of account subjects, we consider the features of their legal regime. Existing approaches to defining the legal regime of an account as an object of information and/or civil legal relations are analyzed in the light of law enforcement practice in the United States of America and the Federal Republic of Germany concerning social network account ownership to draw conclusions about the dual nature of accounts as virtual objects. The study is based on general (analysis, synthesis, analogy) and specific methods (comparative legal and formal legal approaches). Proposed amendments to Federal Law No. 149-FZ of July 27, 2006 “On Information, Information Technologies, and Information Protection” are aimed at eliminating the existing legal gap and bringing certainty to public relations related to the use of social media accounts. It is concluded that an account is an object of legal relations and digital data, the information rights to which (e.g., right of ownership and access to the account) acquire the characteristics of property rights in the context of the digital data economy for the purposes of participation in civil circulation. The results obtained can be used in legislative and law enforcement activities, including in the resolution of disputes related to the ownership of accounts, as well as in the study of the legal nature of other types of virtual objects (digital currencies, domain names, etc.).

1. Agaeva, V. V. (2023). Razdel akkaunta v sotsial'noy seti pri prekrashchenii brachno-semeynykh otnosheniy [Division of a social media account upon termination of marital and family relations]. Vestnik Prava, (4), 4–8.

2. Bachilo, I. L., Polyakova, T. A., Antopol'skiy, A. A., Dem'yanets, M. V., Zharova, A. K., Monakhov, V. N., Semiletov, S. I., & Talapina, E. V. (2017). Ob osnovnykh napravleniyakh razvitiya informatsionnogo prava za 2000-2015 gg. [On the main directions of the development of information law in 2000–2015]. Gosudarstvo i parvo, (1), 71–79.

3. Baturin, y. M. (2022). Ot Interneta do virtual'noi Zemli i metaveselennoy: Kratkaya istoriya informatsionnykh tekhnologiy na kriticheskom rubezhe [From the Internet to the virtual Earth and the metaverse: A brief history of information technologies at a critical juncture]. IIET RAN, AmirIT.

4. Doiev, А. M. (2023). On the concepts of virtual “things” and “thing-ness”. Digital Law Journal, 4(3), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.38044/2686-9136-2023-4-3-8-15

5. Fairfield, J. A. T. (2023). “Veshchnoe” pravo virtual'nykh “veshchey” [Property as the law of virtual things] (A. M. Doiev, Trans.). Digital Law Journal, 4(3), 16–39. https://doi.org/10.38044/2686-9136-2023-4-3-16-39

6. Fedorov, A. M. (2023). Ponyatie i pravovaya priroda akkaunta v sotsial'noy seti [The concept and legal nature of a social media account]. Yuridicheskaya Nauka, (8), 151–155.

7. Grin', E. S. (2022). Nasledovanie akkauntov v sotsial'nykh setyakh: Rossiyskiy i zarubezhnyy opyt [Inheritance of social media accounts: Russian and foreign experience]. Actual Problems of Russian Law, (2), 128–134. https://dx.doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2022.135.2.128-134

8. Kholodnaya, E. V. (2024). O pravovoy kontseptsii metavselennyh [On the legal concept of metaverses]. Lex Russica, 77(3), 116–128. http://dx.doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2024.208.3.116-128

9. Krause, D. (2024). Web3 and the decentralized future: Exploring data ownership, privacy, and blockchain infrastructure. Social Science Research Network. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5064483

10. Khromov, E. V., & Zyablikov, V. yu. (2024). Khishchenie bestelesnogo imushchestva [Theft of incorporeal property]. Ugolovnoye Pravo, (8), 46–67.

11. Kryuchkova, A. D. (2021). Pravovaya priroda Instagram-akkaunta i problema razdela dannogo “imushchestva” [The legal nature of an Instagram account and the problem of dividing this “property”]. Voprosy Rossiyskoy Yustitsii, (14), 233–241⁸¹.

12. Kuznetsov, P. U. (2005). Teoreticheskie osnovaniia informatsionnogo prava [Theoretical foundations of information law] (Dr. Sci. dissertation, Ural State Law University).

13. Mityagin, K. S. (2014). Pravovaia priroda stranitsy sotsial'noi seti [Legal Nature of a Social Network Page]. Zhurnal Suda po Intellektual'nym Pravam, (5), 74–77. https://ipcmagazine.ru/articles/1729162/

14. Naumov, V. B. (2018). Negativnye zakonomernosti formirovaniya ponyatiynogo apparata v sfere regulirovaniya Interneta i identifikatsii [Negative regularities in the formation of the conceptual apparatus in the field of Internet regulation and identification]. Informatsionnoye Pravo, (1), 32–39.

15. Panin, A. V. (2022). Pravovoy rezhim virtual'nykh ob'yektov v informatsionnoy srede [Legal regime of virtual objects in the information environment]. Trudi po Intellectualnoy Sobstvennosti (Works on Intellectual Property), 43(4), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.17323/tis.2022.16351

16. Polyakova, T. A., & Troyan, N. A. (2025). Informatsionnoye pravo i tsifrovaya real'nost': razvitiye, prioritety i problemy v usloviyakh tsifrovoy transformatsii [Information law and digital reality: Development, priorities and problems within digital transformation]. Pravovaya informatika, (2), 31–41.

17. Polyakova, T. A., Minbaleyev, A. V., & Naumov, V. B. (2025). Sovremennyye prioritety razvitiya informatsionnogo prava: pravovoye obespecheniye gosudarstvennogo suvereniteta i informatsionnoy bezopasnosti v informatsionnom prostranstve Rossii [Modern priorities for the development of information law: Legal support for state sovereignty and information security in the information space of Russia]. Gosudarstvo i pravo, (1), 160–173.

18. Rozhkova, M. A. (2024). Nematerial'nye ob'ekty i imushchestvennye prava na nikh v sisteme absolyutnykh prav [Intangible objects and property rights to them in the system of absolute rights]. GAUGN Press.

19. Severgin, A. D. (2023). Pravovaya priroda metavselennoi [The legal nature of the metaverse]. Digital Law Journal, 4(4), 36–53. https://doi.org/10.38044/2686-9136-2023-4-4-1

20. Shipikova, A. G. (2024). Podkhody k opredeleniyu tsifrovogo ob'yekta i tsifrovogo aktiva [Conceptual approaches to defining digital objects and digital assets]. Digital Law Journal, 5(2), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.38044/2686-9136-2024-5-2-1

21. Stepin, V. S. (2010). Istoriya i filosophiya nauki: Uchebnik [History and philosophy of science: Textbook] (3rd ed.). Akademicheskii Proekt.

22. Strel'tsov, A. A. (2019). O predmete i metode informatsionnogo prava [On the subject and method of information law]. Informatsionnoe pravo, 62(4), 4–11.

23. Tereshchenko, L. K. (2022). Transformatsiya ponyatiynogo apparata informatsionnogo prava v usloviyakh tsifrovizatsii [Transformation of the conceptual framework of information law in context of digitalization]. Journal of Russian Law, 26(12), 98–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/jrl.2022.131