Electronic evidence in the theory of judicial evidence

Despite the significant number of works devoted to electronic evidence, both in Russian and foreign legal doctrine, there continues to be keen interest in this topic. In Russian civil procedural law, problems are identified as arising in judicial practice when using electronic evidence. Many scientists and practitioners draw attention to the need to supplement procedural codes with separate articles devoted to electronic evidence — in particular, the procedure for obtaining it by the court. The present study considers whether errors encountered in judicial practice can be traced to in sufficient regulation governing the use of electronic evidence. In essence, this concerns whether electronic evidence has essential differences with other means of proof that need to be reflected in the law by supplementing procedural codes with relevant provisions. Based on general scientific methods (analysis, synthesis, comparison, comparison) and private law methods (formal-legal), special attention in the work is paid to the study of Russian procedural legislation and existing scientific positions in the theory of judicial proof along with proposals for improving procedural legislation in this area. As well as analyzing the main approaches to the concept of electronic evidence existing in science, the work specifies the attributes of electronic evidence, considers the position of electronic evidence in the system of judicial evidence, and identifies a need to supplement procedural codes with separate rules on electronic evidence. The study affirms the correctness of the position according to which electronic evidence should not be considered as a separate means of proof. This conclusion is based on the study of the theory of judicial proof, in which the method of its examination (or obtaining evidence) by the court is determined as a feature of each individual piece of evidence. Since electronic evidence demonstrates no specificity in this respect and based on the study of existing proposals in the scientific literature for improving procedural legislation, it is concluded that procedural codes do not need to be supplemented with separate articles on electronic evidence. Thus, the procedure for handling electronic evidence is subject to the general provisions of the law on judicial evidence (rules for the request, disclosure, provision, examination, and evaluation of evidence), taking into account the existing clarifications for written evidence.

1. Aliev, T. T. (2022). Elektronnye dokazatel’stva kak samostoyatel’naya kategoriya dokazatel’stv v tsivilisticheskom sudoproizvodstve Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Electronic evidence as an independent evidence category in civil proceedings of the Russian Federation]. Arbitrazhnyj i Grazhdanskij Protsess, (5), 28–32. https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383X-2022-5-28-32

2. Balashova, I. N. & Balashov, A. N. (2021). O perspektivakh ispol’zovaniya elektronnykh dokazatel’stv v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve [On the prospects of the use of electronic evidence in civil proceedings]. Administrator Suda, (1), 16–19. https://doi.org/10.18572/2072-3636-2021-1-16-19

3. Bonner, A. T. (2016). Administrativnoe sudoproizvodstvo v Rossijskoy Federatsii: Mif ili real’nost’, ili spor protsessualista s administrativistom [Administrative court procedure in Russia: Myth or reality, or dispute between a processualist and administrative lawyer]. Zakon, (7), 24–51.

4. Bonner, A. T. (2017). Izbrannye trudy (T. 5: Problemy teorii sudebnykh dokazatel’stv) [Selected works (Vol. 5: Problems of the theory of judicial evidence)]. Prospekt.

5. Boriskina, N. I. (2018). Elektronnye dokazatel’stva v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve [Electronic evidence in civil proceedings]. Zakonodatel’stvo, (4), 58–63.

6. Boriskina, N. I. (2020). Protsessual’naya forma dokazatel’stv v sovremennom grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve [Procedural form of evidence in modern civil proceedings] [Doctoral dissertation, Lomonosov Moscow State University].

7. chernykh, I. I. (2022). Vliyanie informatsionnykh tekhnologij na dokazyvanie v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve [The impact of information technology on evidence in civil proceedings]. In E. G. Strel’tsova (Ed.). Tsifrovye tekhnologii v grazhdanskom i administrativnom sudoproizvodstve: Praktika, analitika, perspektivy [Digital technologies in civil and administrative proceedings: Practice, analytics, prospects] (pp. 159–212). Infotropik Media.

8. chechina, N. A. & chechot, D. M. (Eds.). (1984). Sovetskiy grazhdanskiy protsess [Soviet civil procedure]. Izdatel’stvo Leningradskogo Universiteta.

9. Fokina, M. A. (2017). Dokazyvanie v administrativnom sudoproizvodstve: Problemy effektivnosti pravovogo regulirovaniya [Proof in administrative proceedings: Problems of the effectiveness of legal regulation]. Sovremennoe Pravo, (3), 75–79.

10. Grebelsky, A. V. (2015). Elektronnye dokazatel’stva v mezhdunarodnom kommercheskom arbitrazhe [Electronic evidence in international commercial arbitration]. Zakon, (10), 59–70.

11. Grebelsky, A. V. (2017). Dokazatel’stva v mezhdunarodnom kommercheskom arbitrazhe [Evidence in international commercial arbitration] [Doctoral dissertation, Moscow State Institute of International Relations]. http://igpran.ru/prepare/a.persons/GrebelskiiAV/GrebelskiiAB_Dissertatsiya.pdf

12. Kurylev, S. V. (2012). Dokazyvanie i ego mesto v protsesse sudebnogo poznaniya[Proof and its place in the process of judicial knowledge]. In S. V. Kurylev, Izbrannye trudy [Selected works] (pp. 209–302). Redaktsiya zhurnala “Promyshlenno-torgovoe Pravo”. (Original work published in 1955).

13. Laptev, V. A. (2017). Elektronnye dokazatel’stva v arbitrazhnom protsesse [E-evidence in arbitration]. Rossiyskaya Yustitstia, (2), 56–59. https://doi.org/10.18572/0131-6761-2017-2-56-59

14. Lomovtseva, N. V., Zarechneva, K. M., Ushakova, O. V., Yarina, S. Yu. (2021). Slovar` terminov i ponyatiy tsifrovoy didaktiki [Dictionary of terms and concepts of digital didactics]. Azhur.

15. Masaldjiu, R. M. (2024). Perepiska po elektronnoy pochte: kak ubedit’ arbitrazhnyy sudy eye prinyat’ [Email correspondence: How to convince an arbitrazh court to accept it]. Arbitrazhnaya Praktika dlya Yuristov, (12), 20–26.

16. Mitrofanova, M. A. (2013). Elektronnye dokazatel’stva i printsip neposredstvennosti v arbitrazhnom protsesse [Electronic evidence and the principle of immediacy in arbitrazh proceedings] [Doctoral dissertation, Saratov State Law Academy].

17. Nakhova, E. A. (2015). Problemy elektronnykh dokazatel’stv v tsivilisticheskom protsesse [Issues of electronic evidence in the course of civil process]. Leningradskyy Yuridicheskiy Zhurnal, (4), 301–312.

18. Orekhova, D. V. (2022). Tendentsii razvitiya elektronnykh dokazatel’stv v grazhdanskom protsesse [Trends in the development of electronic evidence in civil proceedings]. Arbitrazhnye Spory, (4), 203–213.

19. Sergun, A. K. (1996). Sudebnye dokazatel’stva [Legal evidence]. In M. S. Shakaryan (Ed.), Grazhdanskoye protsessual’noye pravo Rossii. Uchebnik [civil procedural law of Russia. Textbook] (pp. 145–164). Bylina.

20. Sergun, A. K. (2004). Sudebnye dokazatel’stva [Legal evidence]. In M. S. Shakaryan (Ed.), Grazhdanskoye protsessual’noye pravo Rossii. Uchebnik [civil procedural law of Russia. Textbook] (pp. 162–196). Prospect.

21. Shkurova, P. D. (2019). Pis’mennyye dokazatel’stva v grazhdanskom i administrativnom sudoproizvodstve [Written evidence in civil and administrative proceedings] [Doctoral dissertation, Kutafin Moscow State Law University].

22. Strel’tsova, E. G. (2023). Ob aktual’nom znachenii printsipov grazhdanskogo protsessual’nogo prava [On the current significance of the principles of civil procedural law]. In E. I. Nosyreva, I. N. Luk’yanova, D. G. Fil’chenko (Eds.), Ocherki sovremennogo tsivilisticheskogo protsessa: In Memoriam zasluzhennogo deyatelya nauki RossijskojFederatsii, doktora yuridicheskikh nauk, professor Tamary Evgen’evny Abovoy [Essays on the modern civil process: In Memoriam of Tamara Evgenievna Abova, the Honored Scholar of the Russian Federation, Dr. Sci. in Law, Professor] (pp. 9–16). Statut.

23. Strel’tsova, E. G. (2022). Tsifrovye tekhnologii v grazhdanskom i administrativnom sudoproizvodstve: Praktika, analitika, perspektivy [Digital technologies in civil and administrative proceedings: practice, analytics, prospects] (pp. 159–212). Infotropik Media.

24. Treushnikov, M. K. (1999). Sudebnye dokazatel’stva [Forensic evidence]. Gorodets.

25. Vorozhbit, S. P. (2011). Elektronnye sredstva dokazyvaniya v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsesse [Doctoral dissertation, Saint-Petersburg State University].

26. Yaroshenko, T.V. (2023). Problematika elektronnykh dokazatel’stv v usloviyakh razvitiya elektronnogo pravosudiya v arbitrazhnom protsesse [The problem of electronic evidence in the context of the development of electronic justice in the arbitration process]. Administrator Suda, (1), 32–36.https://doi.org/10.18572/2072-3636-2023-1-32-36