Cheats and anti-cheat technologies in the context of copyright: issues of qualification and liability
https://doi.org/10.38044/2686-9136-2025-6-3
Abstract
Computer games have become an integral part of leisure activities for millions of people around the world. At the same time, the desire of players to gain a competitive advantage and the will to achieve immediate results often encourage the users to employ cheats, i.e., software tools enabling victories to be achieved dishonestly. The spread of cheats undermines the principles of fair play and creates unequal conditions for users. This, in turn, leads to a decrease in the gaming audience and, as a result, entails losses for publishers. In addition, cheats often infringe on the exclusive rights of copyright holders. In this regard, the legal issues of cheats, especially in the context of protecting the copyrights of video game copyright holders, represent a relevant research direction. This study aims to characterize cheats and anti-cheat technologies from the legal point of view, to determine their conformity with the provisions of copyright laws and with user agreements, to establish the type of responsibility of the creators of cheats, as well as to identify whether cheats are always deemed unacceptable from the legal point of view. The research was conducted using the methods of formal legal and comparative legal analysis. The former was used to assess the scope of copyright protection of video games and to discuss the capacity of individual norms to cover cheats. The latter was used to compare norms concerning technological means of copyright protection, the scope of copyright protection of video games, etc. As a result, several legal qualifications of cheats (from the point of view of criminal and civil law) were proposed. It was concluded that most modern online game cheats violate the exclusive rights of the authors as well as the provisions of user agreements. In this regard, there is a growing demand for anti-cheating technologies, which are in essence technological means of copyright protection, and in some jurisdictions, the very fact of their circumvention may result in liability.
About the Author
D. V. Graf
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO-University)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Denis V. Graf — Master Student (LL.M.), International Law Faculty
76, Vernadsky Ave., Moscow, 119454
References
1. Collins, S., Poulopoulos, A., Muench, M., & Chothia, T. (2024). Anti-сheat: Attacks and the effectiveness of client-side defences. in Proceedings of the 2024 workshop on research on offensive and defensive techniques in the context of man at the end (MATE) attacks (CheckMATE ‘24) (pp. 30–43). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3689934.3690816
2. Corbett, S. (2016). Videogames and their clones — how copyright law might address the problem. Computer Law & Security Review, 32(4), 615–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2016.05.001
3. de Werra, J. (2021). Contract law and intellectual property transactions: Research perspectives. In I. Calboli, M. L. Montagnani (Eds.), Handbook of intellectual property research: Lenses, methods, and perspectives (pp. 67–82). https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198826743.003.0005
4. Deng, Z., & Li, Y. (2021). Players’ rights to game mods: Towards a more balanced copyright regime. Computer Law & Security Review, 43, Article 105634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105634
5. Doherty, S., Liskey, D., Via, C. M., Frederick, C. M., & Liu, D. (2014). An analysis of expressed cheating behaviors in video games. Proceedings of the 2014 International Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 58(1), 2393-2396. http://doi.org/10.1177/1541931214581498
6. Frasca, G. (2001). Videogames of the oppressed: Videogames as a means for critical thinking and debate [Master’s thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology]. https://ludology.typepad.com/weblog/articles/thesis/frascathesisvideogames.pdf
7. Gorton, S., & Abiona, O. (2023). The confidentiality of coding video games with cheat code and bots for cheating in a virtual world. International Journal of Communications, Network and System Sciences, 6(16), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijcns.2023.166008
8. Grosheide, F. W., Roerdink, H., & Thomas, K. (2014). Intellectual property protection for video games — a view from the european Union. Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology, 9(1), 1–13.
9. Jhang-Li, J. H., & Chiang, R. I. (2024). Strategies for online game publishers to counter third-party cheats. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 64, Article 101364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2024.101364
10. Lee, C. A. (2022). Video game modding in the U.S. intellectual property law: Controversial issues and gaps. Digital Law Journal, 3(4), 8–31. https://doi.org/10.38044/2686-9136-2022-3-4-8-31
11. Rabiolo, M. P. (2024). Legal dimensions of video game modding: A comparative analysis of EU, US, and international legal framework [Master’s Dissertation, Lund University]. https://lup.lub.lu.se/luur/download?-func=downloadFile&recordOId=9158640&fileOId=9158654
12. Rendas, T. (2015). Lex Specialis(sima): Videogames and technological protection measures in EU copyright law. European Intellectual Property Review, 37(1), 39–45.
13. Rendenbach, C. A. (2022). Anti-cheating measures in video games [Bachelor’s Dissertation, Technical University of Munich]. https://collab.dvb.bayern/download/attachments/77832800/main.pdf
14. Schöber, T., & Stadtmann, G. (2022). The dark side of e-sports — An analysis of cheating, doping & matchfixing activities and their countermeasures. International Journal of Esports, 1(1). https://www.ijesports.org/article/98/html
15. Wang, W. (2023). The social harms and criminal liability of selling cheating software for online games: A legal perspective. Communications in Humanities Research, 15, 25–29. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/15/20230534
16. Weisdorfer, E. (2024). Transformative play: The legalities of modding in the video game industry. Cybaris, 16(1), Article 3.
17. Widła, B. (2023). Circular economy versus copyright protection of computer programs in the EU: challenges and lessons from the CJEU’s judgment in Top System. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 18(5), 353–359. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpad021
18. Yan, J., & Randell, B. (2005). A systematic classification of cheating in online games. In Proceedings of 4th ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on network and system support for games, (NetGames 2005) (pp. 1–9). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/1103599.1103606
Review
Views:
24
Email this article 