How and why should we regulate the metaverse?
https://doi.org/10.38044/2686-9136-2024-5-1-4
Abstract
The necessity for legal research into the metaverse phenomenon arises due to its considerable economic strength and social capacity. Built on scientific principles and current experience in the metaverse development, this article aims to determine the general outlook for the evolution of legal regulation in the metaverse. The research methodology is based on general methods of scientific knowledge, including analysis, synthesis, systems approach, modeling, and abstraction. The study also employed the following specific scientific methods of legal cognition of reality: formal-legal, historical-legal, comparative, and logical-legal. The distinctive feature of the research consists in its interdisciplinary connection with another branch of knowledge, i.e., political science. As a result, it is shown that the metaverse subject has particularly interested the state, as well as business not only due to the ample opportunities for exploiting the relevant technologies in various areas of life (using public services, educational environment, and others), but also because uncontrolled development of the metaverse can negatively affect public security. The experience of the People’s Republic of China and South Korea holds a special place here. The results of the study enabled the author to identify three possible models of metaverse regulation depending on the level of state control. They are as follows: liberal free (development of the economic component of the metaverse is prioritized), conservative safe (the metaverse sector development should be totally controlled by the state), and mixed (it combines certain key elements of the first two models).
.
About the Author
M. S. Sitnikov
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (Volgograd Institute of Administration); Volgograd State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Maxim S. Sitnikov — Assistant Professor, Department of Jurisprudence and Public Law; Ph.D. Student, Department of Constitutional and Municipal Law
8, Gagarina str., Volgograd, 400005; 100, ave. Universitetsky, Volgograd, 400062
References
1. Ambrogi, R. J. (2004). The essential guide to the best (and worst) legal sites on the web (2nd ed.). ALM Publishing.
2. Ball, M. (2022). The metaverse: And how it will revolutionize everything. Liveright Publishing.
3. Benjamins, R., Rubio Viñuela, Y., & Alonso, C. (2023). Social and ethical challenges of the metaverse: Opening the debate. AI and Ethics, 3(3), 689–697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-023-00278-5
4. Buana, I. M. W. (2023). Metaverse: Threat or opportunity for our social world? In understanding metaverse on sociological context. Journal of Metaverse, 3(1), 28–33. https://doi.org/10.57019/jmv.1144470
5. Chen, M. (2023). The philosophy of the metaverse. Ethics and Information Technology, 25(3), Article 41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-023-09714-w
6. Cheong, B. C. (2022). Avatars in the metaverse: Potential legal issues and remedies. International Cybersecurity Law Review, 3(2), 467–494. https://doi.org/10.1365/s43439-022-00056-9
7. Cockerton, T., Zhu, Y., & Dhami, M. K. (2024). On conducting ethically sound psychological science in the metaverse. American Psychologist, 79(1), 92–108. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001211
8. Creemers, R. (2022). China’s emerging data protection framework. Journal of Cybersecurity, 8(1), Article tyac011. https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyac011
9. Dizaji, A., & Dizaji, A. (2023). Metaverse and its legal challenges. Synesis, 15(1), 138–151. https://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/synesis/article/view/2395
10. Evsikov, K. S. (2023). Metavselennye kak novyj ob”ekt regulirovaniya dlya informatsionnogo prava [Metaverses as a new object of regulation for information law]. Trudy po intellektual’noj sobstvennosti [Works on Intellectual Property], 1(44), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.17323/tis.2023.16880
11. Fedorchenko, S. N. (2022). Nastuplenie metavselennoj: vozmozhnosti i ogranicheniya cifrovykh tekhnologij v kupirovanii riskov nacizma [Arrival of the metauniverse: Possibilities and limitations of digital technologies in reducing the risks of nazism]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya i politicheskie nauki [Bulletin of Moscow State Regional University. Series: History and Political Sciences], (3), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-676X-2022-3-21-38
12. Filipova, I. A. (2023). Metavselennyye: kak ikh razvitiye povliyayet na rabotnikov i rabotodateley [Metaverses: How their development will affect workers and employers]. Russian Journal of Labor & Law, 13, 45–64. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu32.2023.103
13. Garon, J. M. (2022). Legal implications of a ubiquitous metaverse and a Web3 future. Marqette Law Review, 106 (1), 163–245. https://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr/vol106/iss1/5
14. Gurov, O. N. (2022) Metavselennyye — iz sumerek vo t’mu pereletaya? [Metaverse—flight from dusk to darkness?]. The Art and Science of Television, 18(1), 11–46. https://doi.org/10.30628/1994-9529-2022-18.1-11-46
15. He, Z. (2022). When data protection norms meet digital health technology: China’s regulatory approaches to health data protection. Computer Law & Security Review, 47, Article 105758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105758
16. Kalyvaki, M. (2023). Navigating the metaverse business and legal challenges: Intellectual property, privacy, and jurisdiction. Journal of Metaverse, 3(1), 87–92. https://doi.org/10.57019/jmv.1238344
17. Kostenko, O., Furashev, V., Zhuravlov, D., & Dniprov, O. (2022). Genesis of legal regulation web and the model of the electronic jurisdiction of the metaverse. Bratislava Law Review, 6(2), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.46282/blr.2022.6.2.316
18. Kovaleva, N. N. (2022). Pravovye aspekty tsifrovogo sovershenstvovaniya metavselennykh [Legal aspects of digital improvement of metauniverse]. Pravo.by, 5(79), 81–84.
19. Lee, K. (2023). Counseling psychological understanding and considerations of the metaverse: A theoretical review. Healthcare, 11(18), Article 2490. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11182490
20. Mooij, A. (2024). Regulating the metaverse economy: How to prevent money laundering and the financing of terrorism. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46417-1
21. Nikonov, V. A., Voronov, A. S., Sazhina, V. A., Volodenkov, S. V., & Rybakova, M. V. (2021). Tsifrovoy suverenitet sovremennogo gosudarstva: soderzhaniye i strukturnyye komponenty (po materialam ekspertnogo issledovaniya) [Digital sovereignty of a modern state: Content and structural components (based on expert research)]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sociologiya. Politologiya [Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science], (60), 206–216. https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/60/18
22. Orekhova, S. V., & Plakhin A. E. (2023). Metavselennye: perekhod k novoj biznes-modeli ili obraz budushchego? [Metaverses: Transition to a new business model or the image of the future?]. Upravlenets [The Manager], 14(2), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2023-14-2-3
23. Ovchinnikov, A. I. (2023) Tradicionnye duhovno-nravstvennye cennosti, suverenitet i pravovoe regulirovanie metavselennyh [Traditional spiritual and moral values, sovereignty and legal regulation of metaverses]. Istoriya gosudarstva i prava [History of State and Law], (4), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-3805-2023-4-37-43
24. Rebro, O., Gladysheva, A., Suchkov, M., & Sushentsov, A. (2021). Kategoriya «tsifrovogo suvereniteta» v sovremennoy mirovoy politike : vyzovy i vozmozhnosti dlya Rossii [The notion of “digital sovereignty” in modern world politics challenges and opportunities for Russia]. International Trends, 19(4), 47–67. https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2021.19.4.67.6
25. Sarkisyan, V. V., & Fedorova, I. V. (2023). K voprosu o pravosub’’ektnosti avatara v metavselennoj [On the issue of the legal personality of the avatar in the meta-universe]. Vestnik yuridicheskogo fakul’teta Yuzhnogo federal’nogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Law Faculty of the Southern Federal University], 10(1), 114–119. https://doi.org/10.18522/2313-6138-2023-10-1-13
26. Shabason, V., Malajkin, S., & Shabason, K. (2022). Razumnaya metavselennaya. Ot tsifrovykh prilozheniy k novoy srede obitaniya [The intelligent metaverse: From digital apps to new habitats]. Litres.
27. Sitnikov, M. S. (2023). Pravo i metavselennaya: Nekotoryye voprosy teorii i praktiki [Law and the metaverse: selected issues in theory and practice]. Digital Law Journal, 4(3), 51–71. https://doi.org/10.38044/2686-9136-2023-4-3-2
28. Soliman, M. M., Ahmed, E., Darwish, A., & Hassanien, A. E. (2024). Artificial intelligence powered metaverse: Analysis, challenges and future perspectives. Artificial Intelligence Review, 57(2), Article 36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10641-x
29. Troshhinskij, P. V. (2019). Yuridicheskaya politika i zakonodatel’stvo Kitayskoy Narodnoy Respubliki perioda reform i otkrytosti [Legal policy and the People’s Republic of China’s legislation of reform and opening-up period]. Pravovedenie, 63(2), 285–308. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2019.206
30. Troshchinskij, P. V. (2021). Tsifrovoy Kitay do i v period koronavirusa: osobennosti normativno-pravovogo regulirovaniya [Digital China before and during the coronavirus period: Specifics of normative legal regulation]. Law and Digital Economy, (1), 44–58. https://doi.org/10.17803/2618-8198.2021.11.1.044-058
31. Tsappi, E., & Papageorgiou, G. (2023). Towards deriving organizational key performance indicators in a metaverse workplace: A systematic literature review. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Pervasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (pp. 374–383). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3594806.3594835
32. Turner, C. (2023). The metaverse: Virtual metaphysics, virtual governance, and virtual abundance. Philosophy & Technology, 36(4), Article 67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00666-z
33. Vidal-Tomás, D. (2023). The illusion of the metaverse and meta-economy. International Review of Financial Analysis, 86, Article 102560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102560
34. Yilmaz, H. K. E. (2024). Legal issues of the metaverse: A public international law perspective. Law and Justice Review, (27), 29–58.
35. Zhukov, V. A. (2022). Pravo i etika metavselennoy [Law and ethics of metaverse]. Zakon [The Law], 7, 148–164. https://doi.org/10.37239/0869-4400-2022-19-7-148-164
Review
Views:
541
Email this article 