Limits of product liability of the marketplace owners in the Russian Federation and the USA
https://doi.org/10.38044/2686-9136-2022-3-3-20-42
Abstract
The paper analyzes the limits of product liability of the marketplace for the actions of sellers (performers) in both countries. Research objectives are to identify the main trends in regulating the business of marketplace owners and prepare proposals for amendments to Russian legislation in view of the foreign experience. The relevance of the study is due to the global trend to expand the limits of liability of digital platforms, as evidenced by individual legislative initiatives in recent years, as well as doctrinal studies and discussions in the media. The paper consistently analyzes the special provisions of Russian legislation on consumer protection, which determine the legal status of the owners of marketplaces. Then it reviews the most significant legal disputes in Russia and the USA reflecting the main trends in the field of defining the limits of liability of the owner of the marketplace as an intermediary and directly the seller (performer). Besides, the author identifies and substantiates the main enforcement problems of the responsibility of owners of aggregators in Russia and in the USA. In particular, the author describes the controversial decisions of Russian courts regarding the legal status of the «owner of the aggregator» in the same legal entity. The courts’ formalistic approach based on the literal content of the marketplace owner’s agreements with users is also mentioned. Finally, it is concluded that it would be fair to consolidate the subsidiary liability of the «owners of aggregators» at the legislative level.
About the Author
K. K. Kraulin
Higher School of Economics (HSE University)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
LL.M. Student (LL.M. Program on Digital Law), Faculty of Law,
3, Bolshoy Trekhsvyatitelskiy Pereulok, Moscow, 109028
References
1. Adamenko, A. P., Piskunova, N. I., & Tselovalnikova, I. U. (2021). Aggregator owners’ civil liability when selling goods to consumers. Imuschestvennye otnosheniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii, (12), 58–62.
2. Busch, C. (2019). When product liability meets the platform economy: A European perspective on Oberdorf v. Amazon. Journal of European Consumer and Market Law, (8), 173–174.
3. Bychkov, A. I. (2019). Aggregators and marketplaces. Ekonomiko-pravovoy bulleten, (12).
4. Cunningham-Pameter, K. (2019). Gig-dependence: Finding the real independent contractors of platform work. Northern Illinois University Law Review, 39(3), 379–427.
5. Cunningham-Pameter, K. (2016). From Amazon to Uber: Defining employment in modern economy. Boston University Law Review, 96(5), 1673–1728.
6. Deryugina, T. V. (2018). The legal nature of an agreement mediating origination of legal relationships involving an aggregator. Grazhdanskoye pravo, (6), 3–6.
7. Dolgov, S. G. (2021). Civil liability of taxi aggregators. Grazhdanskoe pravo, (1), 3–7.
8. García-Micó, T. (2022). Platform economy and product liability: Old rules for new markets. IDP: Revista d’Internet, Dret i Política, (34), 1–24.
9. Gubaeva, A. K. (2020). Russian tort law: Contemporary challenges and prospects for development] Zakon, (3), 38–48.
10. Ivanov, A. A. (2017). Aggregation business and law] Zakon, (5), 145–156.
11. Ivanov, A. A. (2019). Chronicle of a dive bomber. Zakon, (7), 82–91.
12. Janger, E. J., & Twerski, A. D. (2020). Warranty, product liability and transaction structure: The problem of Amazon. Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law, 15(1), Article 3. https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/bjcfcl/vol15/iss1/3
13. Janger, E. J., & Twerski, A. D. (2020). The heavy hand of Amazon: A seller not a neutral platform. Brooklyn Journal of Corporate Financial & Commercial Law, 14(2), 259–273. https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/bjcfcl/vol14/iss2/3
14. Keating, G.C. (2001). The theory of enterprise liability and common law strict liability. Vanderbilt Law Review, 54(3), Article 20. https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol54/iss3/20
15. Krasnova, S.A. (2022). Civil legal status of online platform operators: uncertain present and possible future. Imuschestvennye otnosheniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 2(245), 76–86.
16. Kreiczer-Levy, S. (2021). The duties of online marketplaces. San Diego Law Review, 58(2), 269–308. http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79122466.html
17. Kuznetsova, L.V. (2019). Issues of civil liability of e-commerce aggregators. In M.A. Rozhkova (Ed.) E-commerce and related spheres (legal regulation) (pp. 39–65). Statut.
18. Lobel, O. (2016). The Law of the Platform. Minnesota Law Review, (101), 87–166. https://www.minnesotalawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Lobel.pdf
19. Markelova, A.A. (2021). Civil liability of taxi-aggregation companies: Between contract and tort law. Digital Law Journal, 2(4), 8–19. https://doi.org/10.38044/2686-9136-2021-2-4-8-19
20. Pleshanova, O.P. (2019). Multi-level numeration and nation-wide robotization. Zakon, (6), 112–123.
21. Poduzova, E.B. (2021). Participants of digital legal relations: Trends in law and business. Aktualnye problemy rossiyskogo prava, 16(2), 55–60. https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2021.123.2.055-060
22. Semyakin, M.N. (2020). Civil contract in the field of digital economy. Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy journal, 1(130), 107–116.
23. Shaidullina, V.K. (2020). Legal regulation of functionality of the trade aggregators online. Law and Politics, (8), 58–66. https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0706.2020.8.33341
24. Suvorov, E.D. (2019). Some problems of e-commerce: On the question of aggregator owners’ liability to customers. Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii, (9), 57–67.
Review
Views:
3385
Email this article 