Crises of technogenic civilization and their role in the development of law: A retrospective analysis
https://doi.org/10.38044/2686-9136-2026-7-4
Abstract
The article presents a jurisprudential and historical study that proposes a non‑linear interpretation of the evolution of law under the influence of the crises of technogenic civilization. The aim was to model cyclical wave regularities and mechanisms through which such crises shape the dynamics of legal development by synthesizing the crisis approach with the theory of technological orders, as well as to assess the forecasting potential of this model. The methodological framework combines dialectical and systematic approaches, enabling law in general and legislation in particular to be examined in the broader context of civilizational change. Comparative historical and formal legal methods were applied to the analysis of legal regulation in different historical epochs and legal systems. The methodological core of the study is the author’s cyclical wave model of legal development, complemented by a crisis approach to the study of law. According to the proposed model, legal development is understood as a succession of cycles determined by the life cycles of dominant technological paradigms. Within the crisis approach, law is conceptualized as a reflexive system that evolves largely in response to the challenges generated by technogenic civilization itself. Based on the history of legal regulation in Russia and other countries, the study identifies key technological orders and demonstrates that transitions between them, along with the associated crises of technogenic civilization, give rise to regularities that manifest themselves in the rhythms, phases, and waves of qualitative transformations of legal systems, all following a common cyclical wave logic. The mechanisms of cyclical lag, advance, and decyclization in the development of law relative to the dynamics of technological orders are revealed, thereby explaining how legal systems adapt to crisis-induced technological shifts. The proposed cyclical wave model can be used as a tool for long‑term forecasting of legal development scenarios and as a methodological basis for developing regulatory models of advanced legal regulation aimed at increasing the stability of law and legal regulation to possible future crises of technogenic civilization.
About the Author
M. V. ZaloiloRussian Federation
Maksim V. Zaloilo — Ph.D. in Law, Leading Researcher
34, Bolshaya Cheremushkinskaya St., Moscow, 117218
References
1. Alekseev, S. S. (1995). Teoriya prava [Theory of law]. Izdatel’stvo BEK.
2. Aseeva, I. A. (2017). Aksiologicheskie prioritety VI tekhnologicheskogo uklada [Axiological priorities of the VI technological mode]. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 51(1), 124–137. https://doi.org/10.5840/eps201751114
3. Averina, I. S. (2020). Evolyutsiya fenomena «promyshlennaya revolyutsiya»: Predposylki i faktory [Evolution of the "Industrial Revolution" phenomenon: Prerequisites and factors]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Ekonomika, 22(4), 18–25. https://doi.org/10.15688/ek.jvolsu.2020.4.2
4. Averina, I. S. (2021). Promyshlennaya revolyutsiya i tekhnologicheskiy uklad: sushchnostnye kharakteristiki, skhodstva i otlichitel'nye cherty [Industrial Revolution and Technological Pattern: Essential Characteristics, Similarities and Distinctive Features]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Ekonomika, 23(1), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.15688/ek.jvolsu.2021.1.4
5. Bezanson, A. (1922). The early use of the term industrial Revolution. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 36(2), 343–349. https://doi.org/10.2307/1883486
6. Brownsword, R. (2022). Law, authority, and respect: Three waves of technological disruption. Law, Innovation and Technology, 14(1), 5–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2022.2047517
7. Bulatov, R. I. (2020). K budushchim tekhnologicheskim ukladam cherez klasternoe razvitie industrii [Towards future technological structures through cluster development of industry]. Promyshlennaya i Ekologicheskaya Bezopasnost', Okhrana Truda, (6), 11–12.
8. Chernogor, N. N., & Zaloilo, M. V. (2022). Zhiznennyj put' i tvorcheskoe nasledie professora Anatoliya Borisovicha Vengerova [The life path and creative legacy of Professor Anatoly B. Vengerov]. Zhurnal Rossiyskogo Prava, 26(10), 150–173. https://doi.org/10.12737/jrl.2022.112
9. Chernogor, N. N., Emelyanov, A. S., & Zaloilo, M. V. (2021). Gosudarstvennye gimny v mekhanizme kodirovaniya pravovogo povedeniya: Istoricheskiy opyt Rossii [National anthems in the mechanism of coding of legal behavior: The historical experience of Russia]. Voprosy istorii, (4-2), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.31166/Voprosyistorii202104statyi36
10. Chernogor, N. N., Emelyanov, A. S., & Zaloilo, M. V. (2022). Programmiruyushchaya i kodiruyushchaya funktsii prava v evolyutsionnoy izmenchivosti ego sotsial'nogo naznacheniya [Programming and coding functions of law in the evolutionary variability of its social purpose]. Voprosy istorii, (3-2), 90–98. https://doi.org/10.31166/Voprosyistorii202203statyi23
11. Doronina, N. G. (Ed.). (2023). Problemy unifikacii mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava [The problems of the unification of private international law] (2nd ed., rev. and enl.). Yurisprudentsiya.
12. Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, 11(3), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6
13. Filipova, I. A. (2023). Sozdaniye metavselennoy: Posledstviya dlya ekonomiki, sotsiuma i prava [Creating the metaverse: Consequences for economy, society, and law]. Journal of Digital Technologies and Law, 1(1), 7–32. https://doi.org/10.21202/jdtl.2023.1
14. Filippova, S. Yu., & Kharitonova, Yu. S. (2025). Tsifrovye platformy v prave i pravo tsifrovykh platform: Novye vyzovy zakonodatelyu i puti ikh resheniya [Digital platforms in law and the law of digital platforms: New challenges for the legislator and ways to deal with them]. Pravovedenie, 69(1), 58–75. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2025.104
15. Gibbins, H. (1895). Promyshlennaya istoriya Anglii [The industrial history of England] (A. V. Kamenskiy, Trans., 2nd ed.). Izdanie O. N. Popovoy. https://viewer.rsl.ru/ru/rsl01003642829?page=1&rotate=0&theme=black (Original work published 1890)
16. Glazyev, S. Yu. (2018). Ryivok v budushchee. Rossiya v novykh tekhnologicheskom i mirokhozyaystvennom ukladakh [Breakthrough into the future. Russia in the new technological and world economic modes]. Knizhnyy Mir.
17. Glazyev, S. Yu. (1993). Teoriya dolgosrochnogo tekhniko-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya [The theory of long-term techno-economic development]. VlaDar.
18. Glazyev, S. Yu. (2012). Sovremennaya teoriya dlinnykh voln v razvitii ekonomiki [Modern theory of long waves in economic development]. Ekonomicheskaya Nauka Sovremennoy Rossii, (2), 27–42.
19. Glazyev, S. Yu., & Kharitonov, V. V. (Eds.). (2009). Nanotekhnologii kak klyuchevoy faktor novogo tekhnologicheskogo uklada v ekonomike [Nanotechnologies as a key factor of the new technological mode in the economy]. Trovant.
20. Goloskokov, L. V. (2012). Perekhod k setevomu pravu i zakonodatel'stvu kak velenie vremeni [The transition to network law and legislation as an imperative of the times]. Gosudarstvo i Pravo, (2), 78–86.
21. Guseynov, A. A. (2018). Moral' i pravo: liniya razgranicheniya [Morality and law: A demarcation line]. Lex Russica, (8), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2018.141.8.007-022
22. Kargin, I. F., & Kargin, Yu. I. (2014). Evolyutsiya tekhnologicheskikh ukladov: Retrospektiva i sovremennost' [Evolution technological structures in agribusiness: Retrospective and present]. Ekonomicheskaya Istoriya, (2), 93–100.
23. Khabrieva, T. Ya. (2019). Tsiklicheskiye normativnyye massivy v prave [Cyclic normative arrays in law]. Zhurnal Rossiyskogo Prava, (12), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.12737/jrl.2019.12.1
24. Khabrieva, T. Ya. (2025). Pravo v realiyakh tekhnologicheskoy revolyutsii [Law in the realities of the technological revolution]. Norma: INFRA-M. https://doi.org/10.12737/2184987
25. Khabrieva, T. Ya., Emelyanov, A. S., & Zaloilo, M. V. (Eds.). (2025). Pravotvorchestvo v usloviyakh mezhdunarodnoy regionalizatsii [Law-making in the context of international regionalization]. The Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian federation; infRA-M. https://doi.org/10.12737/2192872
26. Kondratyev, N. D. (1922). Mirovoe khozyaystvo i ego konyunktury vo vremya i posle voyny [The world economy and its conjuncture during and after the war]. Vologodskoe Oblastnoe Otdelenie Gosudarstvennogo Izdatel'stva.
27. Kondratyev, N. D. (2002). Bol'shie tsikly konyunktury i teoriya predvideniya [Long cycles of conjuncture and the theory of foresight]. Ekonomika.
28. Kotyal, S. K., & Grinvald, L. C. (2017). Platform law and the brand enterprise. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 32(3), 1135–1182.
29. Kuznetsova, O. A., & Martyanova, E. Yu. (2025). Metavselennaya kak al'ternativnoe pravovoe prostranstvo [The metaverse as an alternative legal space]. Vestnik Universiteta imeni O. E. Kutafina (MGYUA), 1(4), 100–108. https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2025.128.4.100-108
30. Lapaeva, V. V. (2021). Pravo tekhnogennoy tsivilizatsii pered vyzovami tekhnologicheskoy degumanizatsii [The law of a technogenic civilization to face technological dehumanization challenges]. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey Shkoly Ekonomiki, (3), 4–35. https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2021.3.4.35
31. Lonskaya, S. V. (2024). Tsifrovaya istoriya prava: Nachala metodologii [Digital history of law: Principles of methodology]. Journal of Digital Technologies and Law, 2(1), 14–33. https://doi.org/10.21202/jdtl.2024.2
32. Marsh, P. (2015). Novaya promyshlennaya revolyutsiya: Potrebiteli, globalizatsiya i konets massovogo proizvodstva [The new industrial revolution: Consumers, globalization and the end of mass production] (A. Sholomitskaya, Trans.). Izdatel'stvo Instituta Gaydara. (Original work published 2012)
33. Mazhorina, M. V. (2022). Pravo ustoychivogo razvitiya: Sushchnost', predmet i metodologiya [Sustainable development law: Essence, subject and methodology]. Lex Russica, 75(5), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2022.186.5.117-126
34. Pashentsev, D. A., Zaloilo, M. V., & Dorskaya, A. A. (2021). Smena tekhnologicheskikh ukladov i pravovoe razvitie Rossii [Changing of technological orders and legal development of Russia]. INFRA-M: NORMA.
35. Rafalyuk, E. E., Zaloilo, M. V., & Vlasova, N. V. (2016). Ponyatiya, vidy i formy evraziyskogo i latinoamerikanskogo integratsionnykh ob'yedineniy (sravnitel'no-pravovoy analiz) [Concepts, types and forms of Eurasian and Latin-American integration associations (comparative analysis)]. Zhurnal Rossiyskogo Prava, (1), 154–168.
36. Rifkin, J. (2014). Tret'ya promyshlennaya revolyutsiya: kak gorizontal'nyye vzaimodeystviya menyayut energetiku, ekonomiku i mir v tselom [The third industrial revolution: How lateral power is transforming energy, the economy, and the world] (V. Ionov, Trans.). Alpina Non-Fiction. (Original work published 2011)
37. Schumpeter, J. A. (1982). Teoriya ekonomicheskogo razvitiya [The theory of economic development] (V. S. Avtonomov, M. S. Lyubskiy, & A. Yu. Chepurenko, Trans.). Progress. (Original work published 1964)
38. Schwab, K. (2016). Chetvyertaya promyshlennaya revolyutsiya [The fourth industrial revolution] (Sberbank Corporate University, Trans.). Eksmo.
39. Severgin, A. D. (2023). Pravovaya priroda metavselennoy [Legal nature of the metaverse]. Digital Law Journal, 4(4), 36–53. https://doi.org/10.38044/2686-9136-2023-4-4-1
40. Sheptalin, A. A. (2022). Ob istokakh prava s pozitsiy yuridicheskoy antropologii [On the origins of law from the legal anthropology standpoint]. Zhurnal Rossiyskogo Prava, 26(3), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.12737/jrl.2022.027
41. Sitnikov, M. S. (2024). Kak i zachem regulirovat' sferu metavselennykh? [How and why should we regulate the metaverse?]. Digital Law Journal, 5(1), 69–93. https://doi.org/10.38044/2686-9136-2024-5-1-4
42. Stephen, J. F. (1876). A digest of the law of evidence. Macmillan and Co.
43. Stephen, J. F. (1877). A digest of the criminal law: Crimes and punishments. Macmillan and Co.
44. Syukiyaynen, L. R. (2025). Osobennosti sovremennogo islamskogo prava [The specifics of modern Islamic Law]. Pravo Mezhdu Vostokom i Zapadom, (2), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.18572/3034-2953-2025-2-28-41
45. Tolkachev, S. A., & Teplyakov, A. Yu. (2022). Tekhnologicheskie i regulyatornye tsikly v mirokhozyaystvennom razvitii: Istoriko-ekonomicheskaya retrospektiva [Technological and Regulatory Cycles in World Economic Development: Historical and Economic Retrospective]. Terra Economicus, 20(3), 72–86. https://doi.org/10.18522/2073-6606-2022-20-3-72-86
46. Toynbee, A. (1884). Lectures on the industrial revolution in England: Popular addresses, notes and other fragments. Rivingtons.
47. Vdovina, A. A. (2019). Ponyatie «tekhnologicheskij uklad» v sisteme ekonomicheskih kategorij i novye tekhnologicheskie uklady obshchestvennogo razvitiya [The concept of "technological structure" in the system of economic categories and new technological structures of social development]. Kreativnaya Ekonomika, 13(4), 605–618. https://doi.org/10.18334/ce.13.4.40522
48. Vengerov, A. B. (1978). Pravo i informatsiya v usloviyakh avtomatizatsii upravleniya: Teoreticheskie voprosy [Law and information in the context of automated management: Theoretical issues)]. Yuridicheskaya Literatura.
49. Vengerov, A. B. (1981). Nauchno-tekhnicheskiy progress i zakonodatel'stvo razvitogo sotsializma [Scientific and technological progress and the legislation of developed socialism]. Sovetskoe Gosudarstvo i Pravo, (6), 24–33.
50. Zaloilo, M. V. (2025). Metaparadigmal'nost' nauchnogo poznaniya i mezhdistsiplinarnye povoroty v issledovanii pravovoy kul'tury [The metaparadigm of scientific knowledge and interdisciplinary perspectives on legal culture]. RUDN Journal of Law, 29(2), 327–344. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2337-2025-29-2-327-344
51. Zaloilo, M. V., & Vlasova, N. V. (2025). Unifikatsiya i garmonizatsiya chastnogo prava v protsesse translyatsii pravokul'turnoy informatsii [Unification and harmonization of private law in the process of broadcasting legal-cultural information]. Lex Russica, 78(6), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2025.223.6.044-056
Review
JATS XML

































