Правовой режим результатов, создаваемых генеративным искусственным интеллектом

Статья посвящена исследованию правовой природы генеративного искусственного интеллекта и его влияния на авторское право. В ней рассматриваются особенности генеративного искусственного интеллекта, который способен создавать новый контент в ответ на запросы пользователей (промпты). Основное внимание уделяется правовой оценке результатов, сгенерированных с использованием технологий искусственного интеллекта (результатов ИИ), и их сопоставлению с результатами интеллектуальной деятельности, созданными человеком. В статье анализируются критерии охраноспособности таких результатов ИИ в контексте российского законодательства и имеющиеся международные подходы. Автор акцентирует внимание на том, что результаты ИИ, созданные без участия человека, по смыслу закона не могут быть признаны объектами авторских прав по праву Российской Федерации из-за отсутствия творческого вклада и непосредственного участия человека в их создании. Вместо этого предлагается разработка специального правового режима для таких объектов — результатов ИИ, который обеспечит их экономическую ценность и правовую охрану. Также рассматриваются возможные правовые механизмы в качестве инструментов для защиты результатов, созданных с использованием ИИ, при условии наличия значительного творческого вклада человека. Статья подчеркивает необходимость четкого разграничения между объектами, созданными ИИ автономно, без участия человека, и объектами, созданными в результате творческой деятельности человека с использованием ИИ в качестве творческого инструмента. Автор предлагает нормативные положения для регулирования имущественных прав на результаты, сгенерированные ИИ, и рассматривает перспективы развития законодательства в этой области.

1. Avershina, M. V. (2023). Tvorchestvo i iskusstvennyj intellekt [Creativity and artificial intelligence]. Vestnik Luganskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni Vladimira Dalya, S1, 201–209.

2. Balashova, A. I. (2022). Iskusstvennyj intellekt v avtorskom i patentnom prave: Ob”ekty, sub”ektnyj sostav pravootnoshenij, sroki pravovoj ohrany [Artificial intelligence in copyright and patent law: Objects, subjects of legal relations, terms of protection]. Zhurnal Suda po Intellektual’nym Pravam, (2), 90–98.

3. Balashova, A. I. (2023). Pravovoj rezhim rezul’tatov deyatel’nosti iskusstvennogo intellekta: Edinstvo i differenciaciya podhodov [The legal regime of artificial intelligence activity results: Unity and differentiation of approaches]. Zhurnal Suda po Intellektual’nym Pravam, (3), 190–206. https://doi.org/10.58741/23134852_2023_3_20

4. Bøhler, H. M. (2017). EU copyright protection of works created by artificial intelligence systems [Master thesis, University of Bergen]. https://bora.uib.no/bora-xmlui/handle/1956/16479

5. Bonadio, E., Mcdonagh, L., & Arvidsson, C. (2018). Intellectual property aspects of robotics. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 9(4), 655–676. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2018.58

6. Burstyn, N. F. (2016). Creative sparks: Works of nature, selection, and the human author. The Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 39(2), 281–310. https://doi.org/10.7916/jla.v39i2.2089

7. Cappelli, M. A. (2015). Regulation on safety and civil Liability of intelligent autonomous robots: The case of smart Cars [Doctoral dissertation, University of Trento]. http://eprints-phd.biblio.unitn.it/1632/

8. Dickenson, J., Morgan, A., & Clark, B. (2017). Creative machines: Ownership of copyright in content by artificial intelligence applications. European Intellectual Property Review, 39(8), 457–460.

9. Dovgalyuk, A., & Glonina, V. (2018). Pererabotka proizvedeniya vs «parallel’noe» tvorchestvo: Ponyatie, kriterii razgranicheniya [Reproduction of a work vs “parallel” creative work: Concept, criteria of differentiation]. Zhurnal Rossijskoj Shkoly Chastnogo Prava, (3), 175–197.

10. Evteeva, E. V. (2022). Okhranosposobnost’ ob”ektov, sozdannykh iskusstvennym intellektom: teoreticheskoe obobshchenie [Protectability of AI-generated objects: A theoretical synthesis]. Zhurnal Suda po Intellektual’nym Pravam, (3), 97–110.

11. Gurko, A.B. (2017). Iskusstvennyj intellekt i avtorskoe pravo: Vzglyad v budushchee [Artificial intelligence and copyright: A look into the future]. Zhurnal “I.S. Avtorskoe Pravo i Smezhnye Prava”, 12, 7–18.

12. Hristov, K. (2020). Artificial intelligence and the copyright survey. Journal of Science Policy & Governance, 16(1). https://www.sciencepolicyjournal.org/uploads/5/4/3/4/5434385/hristov_jspg_v16.pdf

13. Hutson, J. (2024). The evolving role of copyright law in the age of AI-generated works. Journal of Digital Technologies and Law, 2(4), 886–914. https://doi.org/10.21202/jdtl.2024.43

14. Ionas, V. Ya. (1963). Kriteriy tvorchestva v avtorskom prave i sudebnoy praktike [The criterion of creativity in copyright law and judicial practice]. Yuridicheskaya literatura.

15. Ionas, V. Ya. (1972). Proizvedeniya tvorchestva v grazhdanskom prave [Works of creativity in civil law]. Yuridicheskaya literatura.

16. Isaeva, O. V. (2023a). Original’nost’ proizvedeniya kak kriterij ohranosposobnosti [Originality of a work as a criterion for its protectability]. Trudy po Intellectualnoy Sobstvennosti [Works on Intellectual Property], 44(1), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.17323/tis.2023.16882

17. Isaeva, O. V. (2023b). Predely svobody avtora proizvodnogo proizvedeniya [Limits on the freedom of the author of a derivative work] [Ph.D. Thesis, Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation].

18. Ivanov, N. V. (2020). Avtorskie i smezhnye prava v muzyke [Copyright and related rights in music] (A. P. Sergeev, Ed.; 2nd ed.). Prospekt.

19. Kashanin, A. V. (2007). Problema minimal’nykh standartov ohranosposobnosti proizvedenij v avtorskom prave. Germanskij opyt [The problem of minimum standards of copyrightability in copyright law: The German experience]. Vestnik Grazhdanskogo Prava, (4), 23–62.

20. Kashanin, A. V. (2010). Minimal’nyj uroven’ tvorcheskogo kharaktera proizvedenij v avtorskom prave Francii [Works with minimum authorship level in French copyright]. Law Journal of the Higher School of Economics, (1), 114–124. https://law-journal.hse.ru/article/view/20644

21. Kashtanova, P. A. (2023). Perspektivy pravovoj okhrany proizvedenij, sozdavaemykh s ispol’zovaniem iskusstvennogo intellekta v Rossii. Zhurnal Suda po Intellektual’nym Pravam, (1), 120–132. https://doi.org/10.58741/23134852_2023_1_120

22. Kharitonova, Y. S., & Savina, V. S. (2020). Tekhonologiya iskusstvennogo intellekta i pravo: Vyzovy sovremennosti [Artificial intelligence technology and law: Challenges of our time]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki [Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences], (49), 524–549. https://doi.org/10.17072/19954190-2020-49-524-549

23. Kirpichev, A. E. (2024). Prompts for generative artificial intelligence in legal discours. RUDN Journal of Law, 28(4), 906–918. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2337-2024-28-4-906-918

24. Komashko, M. N. (2024). ChatGPT, tekst, informaciya: kriticheskij analiz [ChatGPT, text, information: Critical analysis]. Trudi po Intellectualnoy Sobstvennosti (Works on Intellectual Property), 50(3), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.17323/tis.2024.22306

25. Kopylov, A. Y. (2019). Tvorchestvo kak uslovie ohranosposobnosti proizvedeniya [Creativity as a condition for copyrightability of a work]. Imushchestvennye Otnosheniya v Rossijskoj Federacii, (12), 56–62. https://doi.org/10.24411/2072-4098-2019-11204

26. Kopylov, A. Y. (2020). Spetsifika tvorchestva v proizvedeniyah nauki, literatury i iskusstva kak usloviya predostavleniya im avtorsko-pravovoj okhrany [The specifics of creativity in the works of science, literature, and art as a condition for granting copyright protection to these works]. Epomen Scientific Journal, (41), 308–319. https://epomen.ru/issues/2020/41/24.pdf

27. Korolkova, D. A. (2024). Programmy iskusstvennogo intellekta i ikh klassifikaciya: Grazhdansko-pravovoj podhod [Artificial intelligence programs and their classification: A civil law approach]. Zakon i Pravo [Law & Legislation], 8, 146–152. https://doi.org/10.24412/2073-3313-2024-8-146-152

28. Kositsky, A. O. (2023). Tvorchestvo kak kriterij okhranosposobnosti ob”ektov avtorskikh prav: Samostoyatel’noe sozdanie i tvorcheskij kharakter. Uroven’ tvorcheskogo kharaktera [Originality: Independent creation and creativity. Level of creativity]. Zhurnal Suda po Intellektual‘nym Pravam, (4), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.58741/23134852_2023_4_7

29. Krasavchikov, O. A. (1958). Yuridicheskie fakty v sovetskom grazhdanskom prave [Legal facts in Soviet civil law]. Gosyurizdat.

30. Kukhno, M. O. (2023). Iskusstvennyj intellekt — novyj sub»ekt avtorskogo prava: Nedalekoe budushchee ili fikciya? [Artificial intelligence is a new subject of copyright: the near future or fiction?] Zhurnal Suda po Intellektual‘nym Pravam, (3), 72–86. https://doi.org/10.58741/23134852_2023_3_8

31. Li, Y. (2023). Normativno-pravovoe regulirovanie generativnogo iskusstvennogo intellekta v Velikobritanii, SShA, Evropejskom soyuze i Kitae [Specifics of regulatory and legal regulation of generative artificial intelligence in the UK, USA, EU and China]. Law Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 16(3), 245–267. https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2023.3.245.267

32. Lutkova, O. V. (2017). Transgranichnye avtorskie otnosheniya neisklyuchitel’nogo haraktera: Material’no-pravovoe i kollizionno-pravovoe regulirovanie [Cross-border non-exclusive copyright relations: Substantive and conflict of laws regulation]. Prospekt.

33. Machanov, D. N. (2020). Kriterii tvorcheskoj deyatel’nosti ili vklada ob»ektov avtorskogo prava, sozdannyh iskusstvennym intellektom [Criteria for creative activity or contribution of copyright objects created by artificial intelligence]. Obrazovanie i pravo, 2, 333–335. https://doi.org/10.24411/2076-1503-2020-10260

34. Mikhailov, S. V. (2021). Prezumpciya tvorcheskogo haraktera (original’nosti) ob”ektov avtorskih prav [The presumption of a creative nature (originality) of copyright objects]. Lex Russica, 10(74), 9–25. https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2021.179.10.009-025

35. Milyukov, S. A. (2025). Ob"ekty, sozdannye s ispol’zovaniem iskusstvennogo intellekta kak ob"ekty avtorskikh i smezhnykh prav [Objects generated by neural networks as an object of copyright and related rights]. Zhurnal Suda po Intellektual’nym Pravam, (1), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.58741/23134852_2025_1_6

36. Morkhat, P. M. (2018a). Sistema iskusstvennogo intellekta kak sub"ekt avtorskogo i patentnogo prava [Artificial intelligence systems as subjects of copyright and patent law]. Copyright (Bulletin of the Academy of Intellectual Property), (3), 82–92.

37. Morkhat, P. M. (2018b). Pravosub”ektnost’ iskusstvennogo intellekta v sfere prava intellektual’noj sobstvennosti: Grazhdansko-pravovye problemy [Legal personality of artificial intelligence in the sphere of intellectual property law: Civil law problems] [Ph.D. Thesis]. Rossijskaya Gosudarstvennaya Akademiya Intellektual’noj Sobstvennosti.

38. Motovilova, D. A. (2019). Perspektivy avtorsko-pravovoj zashchity rezul’tatov, sozdannyh sistemami iskusstvennogo intellekta, s pozicii amerikanskogo prava [Prospects for copyright protection of AI-generated outputs: A U.S. legal perspective]. Zhurnal Suda po Intellektual’nym Pravam, (1), 56–67. https://ipcmagazine.ru/files/ipcmagazine/1/4/1735741/journal032019.pdf

39. Naumov, V. B., & Tytiuk, E. V. (2018). K voprosu o pravovom statuse «tvorchestva» iskusstvennogo intellekta [On the legal status of the “art” of the artificial intelligence]. Pravovedenie, 62(3), 531–540. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu25.2018.307

40. Nazarov, N. A. (2022). Mashinnoe tvorchestvo i pravo: Dve chasti odnogo tselogo [Machine creativity and the law: Two parts of a whole]. Trudy po Intellectualnoy Sobstvennosti [Works on Intellectual Property], 43(4), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.17323/tis.2022.16358

41. Novoselova, L. A. (Ed.). (2017). Pravo intellektual’noy sobstvennosti: Uchebnik [Intellectual property law: Textbook] (Vol. 2. Avtorskoe pravo [Copyright law]). Statut.

42. Ogorodnikova, K. S. (2021). Problema original’nosti proizvedeniya v avtorskom prava [The problem of the originality of a work in copyright]. Voprosy rossijskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava [Matters of Russian and International Law], 11A(11), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.34670/AR.2021.97.15.007

43. Pankratova, L. S. (2019). Eticheskie problemy i politika regulirovaniya vnedreniya tekhnologij iskusstvennogo intellekta v servisy onlajn-znakomstv [Ethical problems and regulation policy of artificial intelligence technologies implementation in online dating services]. Azimut Nauchnykh Issledovanij: Ekonomika i Upravlenie [Azimuth of Scientific Research: Economics and Administration], 8(4), 47–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.26140/anie-2019-0804-0094

44. Pasternak, V. S. (2021). Kriterij tvorchestva i problema malotvorcheskih proizvedenij v avtorskom prave [The criterion of creativity and the problem of low-creativity works in copyright law]. In E. P. Gavrilov & S. V. Butenko (Eds.), Intellektual’nye prava: Vyzovy XXI veka: Sbornik dokladov III Mezhdunarodnoj konferencii (pp. 43–49).

45. Popova, A. V., & Kiselevskaya, L. E. (2018). Kontspetsia postcheloveka — novyj diskurs XXI v. [The posthuman concept — a new discourse of the 21st century]. Istoriya i Sovremennost, 3, 51–65. https://doi.org/10.30884/iis/2018.03.03

46. Rakhmatullina, R. Sh. (2013). Tvorcheskij i netvorcheskij aspekt ob”ektov intellektual’noj sobstvennosti [Creative and non-creative aspect of intellectual property objects]. In Konvergenciya chastnogo i publichnogo prava: Problemy sovershenstvovaniya sovremennogo zakonodatel’stva: Sbornik materialov Vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii, posvyashchennoj pamyati zasluzhennogo yurista RF, dokt. Yurid. Nauk, prof. N.M. Korshunova (pp. 217–220).

47. Rozhkova, M. A. (2010). Teorii yuridicheskih faktov grazhdanskogo i processual’nogo prava: Ponyatiya, klassifikacii, osnovy vzaimodejstviya [Theories of legal facts of civil and procedural law: Concepts, classifications, bases of interaction] [Dr.Sci. Thesis, Russian Academy of Public Service].

48. Rozhkova, M. A. (2024a). 5 priznakov (kriteriev ohranosposobnosti) proizvedenij nauki, zakreplennykh dejstvuyushchim zakonodatel’stvom [5 attributes (criteria of protectability) of works of science enshrined in the current legislation]. Zhurnal Suda po Intellektual’nym Pravam, (2), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.58741/23134852_2024_2_8

49. Rozhkova, M. A. (2024b). 5 priznakov (kriteriev ohranosposobnosti) proizvedenij literatury i iskusstva, zakreplennyh dejstvuyushchim zakonodatel’stvom [5 attributes (criteria of protectability) of works of literature and art enshrined in the current legislation]. Zhurnal Suda po Intellektual’nym pravam, (1), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.58741/23134852_2024_1_4

50. Rozhkova, M. A., & Isaeva, O. V. (2021). Pravovye rezhimy fotografii v rossijskom prave [Legal regime of photography in Russian law]. Zhurnal Suda po Intellektual’nym Pravam, (2), 55–69.

51. Rozhkova, M. A., & Isaeva, O. V. (2023). Kvalifikaciya v kachestve proizvodnyh proizvedenij ob”ektov, sozdavaemyh na osnove rezul’tatov mashinnogo obucheniya i «proizvedenij» iskusstvennogo intellekta [Qualification as derivative works of objects created using the results of machine learning and artificial intelligence “works”]. In M. A. Rozhkova (Ed.), Intellektual’nye prava v cifrovuyu epohu: Izbrannye aspekty. Vypusk 19 (pp. 153–172). GAUGN Press. https://rozhkova.com/pdf/19-AI-2023.pdf

52. Serebrovskij, V. I. (1956). Voprosy sovetskogo avtorskogo prava (P. E. Orlovskij, Ed.). Izdatel’stvo AN SSSR.

53. Sesitsky, E. P. (2018). Problemy pravovoj ohrany rezul’tatov, sozdavaemyh sistemami iskusstvennogo intellekta [Problems of legal protection of works created by artificial intelligence systems] [Ph.D. Thesis, Rossijskaya Gosudarstvennaya Akademiya Intellektual’noj Sobstvennosti].

54. Shakhnazarova, E. A. (2021). Pravovoe regulirovanie otnoshenij, voznikayushchih po povodu ob”ektov intellektual’noj sobstvennosti, sozdannyh tekhnologiej iskusstvennogo intellekta, na primere opyta Velikobritanii, SShA i ES [Legal regulation of relations emerging from intellectual property, created by artificial intelligence technology on the example of the experience of the UK, USA and the EU]. Zhurnal Suda po Intellektual’nym Pravam, (2), 34–45.

55. Sinitsyn, I. N., Druzhinina, O. V., Belousov, V. V., Masina, O. N., & Petrov, A. A. (2019). Opyt razrabotki instrumental’no-metodicheskogo obespecheniya dlya resheniya zadach modelirovaniya nelinejnyh upravlyaemyh sistem s primeneniem tekhnologij mashinnogo obucheniya i otechestvennyh programmno-apparatnyh sredstv [Development of methodological tools for modeling nonlinear control systems using machine learning technologies and domestic software/hardware solutions]. Nelinejnyj mir, 4(17), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.18127/j20700970-201903-06

56. Slobodyan, S. (2012). O pravovyh osnovaniyah priznaniya proizvedeniya ob”ektom avtorskogo prava [On the legal grounds for recognizing a work as subject to copyright protection]. Khozyajstvo i Pravo, 2, 91–99.

57. Timofeev, A. A. (2010). Opredelenie kriteriev tvorchestva v proizvedeniyakh periodicheskoj pechati [Defining creativity criteria in periodical publications]. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 10 “Zhurnalistika”, (3), 172–186.

58. Tiunova, A. I. (2021). Informacionnaya i tvorcheskaya sostavlyayushchie ob”ektov avtorskih prav: Sootnoshenie i znachenie dlya svobodnogo ispol’zovaniya [The informational and creative components of copyright objects: Correlation and significance for fair use]. Zhurnal Suda po Intellektual’nym Pravam, (3), 169–177.

59. Tsymbalova, Y. U. (2020). Avtorskoe pravo na proizvedeniya, sozdannye komp’yuternymi programmami [Copyright in works created by computer programs]. In Intellektual’nye prava: Sbornik rabot vypusknikov RShChP, posvyashchennyj 90-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya Viktora Abramovicha Dozorceva. Statut.

60. Yatsenko, L. V. (2010). Tvorchestvo [Creative work]. In Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences, National Social Science Foundation, V. S. Stepin (Eds.). Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya [New Philosophical Encyclopedia] (Vol. 1–4, 2-nd rev. ed.). Mysl’. https://iphlib.ru/library/collection/newphilenc/document/HASH01089445249fc349f1553108.