Preview

Digital Law Journal

Advanced search

The right to a name: Back to the future

https://doi.org/10.38044/2686-9136-2020-1-3-40-50

Full Text:

Abstract

This article focuses on the right to a name, which in private law doctrine is traditionally considered a basic human right. The meaning of this right is indisputable and holds a fundamental value for everyone, since a name individualizes each person. However, the purpose of this article is not to tell the history of this right, but to study its nature. The development of the internet and digital technologies has made it possible to take a fresh look at the right to a name; when registering on social media, a person also uses his or her name, and in some cases acquires a pseudonym (nickname). In this study, the author aims at answering the question of what, in the era of the internet, is truly meant by the right to a name.
Methodologically, there are two general approaches to understand the right to a name: the first one is AngloAmerican and the second one is European. While it is typical for common-law countries to consider a name as an element of privacy, in continental legal tradition the right to a name is considered as a type of personal right, as well as one of the conditions of legal capacity. Both approaches are re-examined in this study.
Having started with the right to a name, in the final paragraph of the article the author reaches the issue of the right to a pseudonym. This topic is illustrated with the case of “the fight against rootless cosmopolitism”, when many representatives of the Jewish intelligentsia in the Soviet Union became victims of discrimination, at a time when it public authorities assumed that the use of a pseudonym was dangerous as they could lose control over the people; ironically, many modern states have declared the same criticism of the right to a nickname regarding the internet. This example clearly shows that, throughout history, non-democratic regimes have systematically attacked and diminished the right to a name.
It is concluded that the advent of new technologies has not changed the essence of a name. Therefore, any unreasonable limitation of the right to a name and the right to a pseudonym should be defined as a violation of the basic principles of democracy and the rule of law.

About the Author

Alim K. Ulbashev
French University College in Moscow
Russian Federation

Alim K. Ulbashev — PhD in Law, lecturer

1, Leninskie Gory, Moscow, Russia, 119991



References

1. Agarkov, M. (2012). Izbrannye trudy po grazhdanskomu pravu [Selected works on private law] (Vols. 1–2). Statute.

2. Agranovsky, G., & Kopilevich, K. (1995). Kogda rossijskie evrei prinyali familii [When did Russian Jews adopt last names?]. The Journal of Hebrew University in Moscow, 1(8), 80–82.

3. Bannasch, M. (2014). Der Gemeingebrauch des Namens [Common usage of the name]. Mohr Siebeck.

4. Bertrand-Mirkovic, A. (2004). Droit civil: Personnes, famille [Civil law: People, family]. Studyrama.

5. Bratus, S. (1963). Predmet i sistema sovetskogo grazhdanskogo prava [The subject and system of the Soviet civil law]. Gosjurizdat.

6. Erdelevsky, A. (1999). Pravo na imya i ego zashchita [The right to a name and its protection]. Justice, 10, 15–18.

7. Fleishitz, Y. (2009). Sootnoshenie pravosposobnosti i sub”ektivnyh prav [The ratio of legal capacity and subjective rights]. Civil Law Review, 9(2), 209–230.

8. Fleishitz, Y. (2015). Izbrannye trudy po grazhdanskomu pravu [Selected works on civil law] (Vols. 1–2). Statute.

9. Fleishitz, Y., & Makovsky, A. (1963). Teoreticheskie voprosy kodifikacii respublikanskogo grazhdanskogo zakonodatel’stva [Theoretical issues of the codification of the republican civil legislation]. Soviet State and Law, (1), 79–91.

10. Genkin, D. (Ed.). (1950). Sovetskoe grazhdanskoe parvo [Soviet civil law]. Gosjurizdat.

11. Götting, H.-P. (1995). Persönlichkeitsrechte als Vermögensrechte [Personal rights as property rights]. Mohr Siebeck.

12. Griffith, R. (2016). Parents’ right to name their baby. British Journal of Midwifery, 7(24), 525–527. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2016.24.7.525

13. Ioffe, O. (1962). Novaya kodifikaciya sovetskogo grazhdanskogo zakonodatel’stva i ohrana chesti i dostoinstva grazhdan [New codification of the Soviet civil legislation and protection of honor and dignity]. Soviet State and Law, (7), 59–71.

14. Ioffe, O. (1966). Lichnye neimushchestvennye prava i ih mesto v sisteme sovetskogo grazhdanskogo prava [Personal rights and their place in the system of Soviet civil law]. Soviet State and Law, (7), 51–59.

15. Köhler, H. (2016). BGB. Algemeiner Teil [BGB. General part]. C.A. Beck.

16. Korneev, S. (2012). Izbrannye trudy po grazhdanskomu pravu [Selected works on civil law]. Statute.

17. Kushner, J. (2009). The right to control one’s name. UCLA Law Review, 57(2), 31–364. https://www.uclalawreview.org/the-right-to-control-ones-name/

18. Larson, C. (2011). Naming baby: The constitutional dimensions of parental naming rights. The George Washington Law Review, 80, 159–201. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1747858

19. Maleina, M. (2000). Lichnye neimushchestvennye prava grazhdan: Ponyatie, osushchestvlenie i zashchita [Personal rights of citizens: The Concept, realization, and protection]. MZ Press.

20. Pirogova, E. (2019). Otvetstvennost’ roditelej za nesvoevremennuyu registraciyu rozhdeniya rebenka [Responsibility of parents for the late registration of a child’s birth]. Family and Housing Law, (1), 14–17.

21. Planiol, M. (1920). Traité élémentaire de droit civil, Principes généraux, Les personnes, La famille, Les incapables, Les biens [Elementary treatise on civil law, general principles, persons, family, incapable persons, Property]. Librairie générale de droit & de jurisprudence.

22. Pokrovsky, J. (2013). Osnovnye problemy grazhdanskogo prava [The main problems of private law]. Statute.

23. Sedano, L., & Doskow, E. (2001). How to change your name in California. Nolo.

24. Simon, J. (1981). Das allgemeine Persönlichkeitsrecht und seine gewerblichen Erscheinungsformen [The general right of personality and its commercial manifestations]. Duncker & Humblot.

25. van Bueren, G. (1998). The international law on the rights of the child. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.


Views: 286


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2686-9136 (Online)