Conceptual approaches to defining digital objects and digital assets

The development of digital technologies has led to the emergence of new objects of law and legal relations, the understanding of which is necessary to ensure the implementation of human rights and fundamental freedoms, including the right to property and the right to respect for human dignity. Among the main objects that have arisen as a result of the development of digital technologies are digital objects and assets. The purpose of this article is to attempt to formulate the concept of a “digital object”, conduct a comparative study of approaches to defining the concept of a “digital asset”, highlight the key features of the concept of a “digital asset”, propose approaches to determining the relationship between the concepts of a “digital object” and a “digital asset”, which will contribute to the development of legal regulation in the context of the digitalization of society. The approaches to defining the concepts of a “digital object” and a “digital asset” contained in doctrinal sources both in the Russian Federation and abroad (USA, Great Britain, Germany) are analyzed. An analysis of these categories contained in regulatory sources, including at the level of international organizations and interstate integration associations, is carried out. The study used dogmatic and formal-logical methods, an axiological approach and a comparison method. Based on the results of the analysis, definitions of the concepts of “digital object”, “digital asset”, and approaches to their relationship are proposed. The essential characteristics of such a category as “digital asset” are identified based on the materials developed at the level of the International Institute for the Unification of Private Law (UNIDROIT), the CIS, and the European Institute of Law, and the common features and differences between the concepts of “digital object” and “digital asset” are analyzed. A conclusion is formulated that a digital object can be considered as a general, generic concept that includes digital assets and other objects, such as social media accounts, email accounts, while an essential, constitutive feature of a digital asset is the concept of control over a digital asset.

1. Armstrong, D., & Samuels, M. (2022). Bloomsbury professional law insight—Cryptocurrency in matrimonial finance. Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.

2. Ayusheeva, I. Z. (2021). Tsifrovyye ob”yekty grazhdanskikh prav [Digital objects of civil rights]. Lex russica, 74(7), 32–43. https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2021.176.7.032-043

3. Brennen, S. J., & Kreiss, D. (2016). Digitalization. In K. B. Jensen, R. T. Craig, J. D. Pooley, & E. W. Rothenbuhler (Eds.) The international encyclopedia of communication theory and philosophy (pp. 1–11). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118766804.wbiect111

4. Fairfield, J. (2023). Property as the law of virtual things [“Veshchnoye” pravo virtual’nykh “veshchey”] (A.M. Doiev, trans.). Digital Law Journal, 4(3), 16–39. https://doi.org/10.38044/2686-9136-2023-4-3-16-39

5. Farooqui, M. O., Sharma, B., & Gupta, D. (2022). Inheritance of digital assets: Analyzing the concept of digital inheritance on social media platforms. Novum Jus, 16(3), 413–435. https://doi.org/10.14718/Novum-Jus.2022.16.3.15

6. Faulkner, P., & Runde, J. (2019). Theorizing the digital object. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 43(4), 1279–1302. https://misq.umn.edu/theorizing-the-digital-object.html

7. Hagberg, J., Sundstrom, M., & Egels-Zandén, N. (2016). The digitalization of retailing: An exploratory framea - work. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 44(7), 694–712.

8. Hui, Y. (2012). What is a digital object? Metaphilosophy, 43(4), 380–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2012.01761.x

9. Ivanov, A. A. (2023). Tsifrovizatsiya i veshchnyye prava. Fragment iz tsikla lektsiy “Grazhdanskoye pravo i tsifrovizatsiya”. [Digitalization and ius ad rem. An excerpt from the lecture series “Civil Law and Digitalization”]. Zakon, (7), 43–52.

10. Kallinikos, J., Aaltonen, A. V., & Marton, A. (2010). A theory of digital objects. First Monday, 15(6). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v15i6.3033

11. Klasiček, D. (2023). Inheritance law in the twenty-first century: New circumstances and challenges. In O. J. Gstrein, M. Fröhlich, C. van den Berg, & T. Giegerich (Eds.), Modernising European Legal Education (MELE) (pp. 235–251). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40801-4_15

12. Koles, B., & Nagy, P. (2021). Digital object attachment. Current Opinion in Psychology, 39, 60–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.07.017

13. Kraus, S., Durst, S., Ferreira, J. J., Veiga, P., Kailer, N., & Weinmann, A. (2022). Digital transformation in business and management research: An overview of the current status quo. International Journal of Information Management, 63, Article 102466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102466

14. Lyons, P. A. (1998). Managing access to digital information: Some basic terminology issues. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 24(2), 21–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/bult.81

15. Melnikova, T. V., Nikitashina, N. A., & Schalyaeva, J. V. (2023). Tsifrovyye finansovyye aktivy kak ob”yekty grazhdanskikh prav [Digital financial assets as objects of civil rights]. Jurist [The Lawyer], (11), 37–42.

16. Sklovskiy, K. I. (2023). Sobstvennost’ v grazhdanskom prave [Property in civil law] (6th ed.). Statut.

17. Srai, J. S., & Lorentz, H. (2019). Developing design principles for the digitalisation of purchasing and supply management. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 25(1), 78–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2018.07.001

18. Sukhanov, E. A. (2021). O grazhdansko-pravovoi prirode “tsifrovogo imushchestva” [Оn the civil legal nature of “digital property”]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava [Civil Law Review], 21(6), 7–29.

19. Velichko, V. E., & Evstignev, E. A. (2019). Tsifrovyye prava v Rossii: dvizheniye vpered ili beg po krugu? [Digital rights in Russia: Moving forward or running in circles?]. Zhurnal Zhurnal rossiyskoy shkoly chastnogo prava [Journal of the Russian Private Law School], (2), 48–59.

20. Volos, A. (2022). Digitalization of society and objects of hereditary succession. Law Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 15(3), 51–71. https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2022.3.51.71