dirightDigital Law JournalЦифровое право2686-9136Maxim Inozemtsev10.38044/2686-9136-2025-6-13diright-304Research ArticleESSAYSЭССЕDigital parenting: Technologies and artificial intelligence in the realization of parents’ rights to communicate with the childЦифровое родительство: технологии и искусственный интеллект в механизме реализации права родителей на общение с ребенкомhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5793-2736ЕрохинаЕ. В.ErokhinaE. V.

Кандидат юридических наук, доцент, доцент кафедры гражданского права и процесса, юридический факультет

460018, Оренбург, пр. Победы, 13

Elena V. Erokhina — Ph.D. in Law, Associate Professor, Department of Civil Law and Procedure, Faculty of Law

13, Pobedy Ave., Orenburg, 460018

erohina.elena2020@gmail.comОренбургский государственный университетРоссияOrenburg State UniversityRussian Federation202528022026633466Copyright © Erokhina E.V., 20262026Ерохина Е.В.Erokhina E.V.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.digitallawjournal.org/jour/article/view/304

Digital technologies and artificial intelligence, which are increasingly used to address general tasks across all areas of society, may also serve as technical means for enforcing the rights of children and separatelyliving parents to maintain contact with one another. Delineating the internationally recognized conceptual model of “virtual parenting” as an additional means of communication between a child and a parent residing separately, the study substantiates the possibility of applying such a model to the construction of family relationships and corresponding regulation at the conflict stage within the Russian legal framework. Using a formal legal methodology, the author provides a comparative legal review of the application of contemporary foreign applications (software programs) designed to ensure a neutral digital environment for such communication. Due to the need for “fine-tuning” interpersonal relationships within the framework of the family, representing one of the most complex social institutions, works from other disciplines—primarily psychology and sociology—were also analyzed. The need to develop and implement a state-run online platform—provisionally entitled “The Territory of Family Communication and Trust”— powered by artificial intelligence for enabling virtual communication between a child and a parent is outlined. An examination of law enforcement and judicial practice demonstrates that, despite modern legal systems formally granting a separately residing parent the right to communicate with—and participate in the upbringing of—a child, in cases of resistance by the other parent, the practical realization of this right becomes difficult and, in some cases, impossible. It is argued that, in certain cases, access to such a platform should be granted to state authorities (for example, bailiffs), and that digital reports generated by the platform should be endowed with evidentiary legal force. It is concluded that, in the digital era, it is necessary to leverage the capabilities of technologies and artificial intelligence to support family and society institutionally through a more flexible mechanism for enforcing the right to family communication and preventing potential abuses by one of the parents.

Цифровые технологии и искусственный интеллект находят все более широкое применение в различных сферах жизни и могут быть использованы не только для решения текущих утилитарных и ныне уже общеизвестных задач, которые обуславливают написание компьютерного кода, но и в качестве технических гарантий реализации прав детей и родителя, проживающих раздельно, на общение. Цель исследования сводится к тому, чтобы описать концептуальные рамки известной за рубежом модели «виртуального родительства» как дополнительного способа общения ребенка с родителем, проживающим отдельно, и обосновать возможность применения данного способа построения семейных отношений и их соответствующей регламентации в конфликтной стадии в рамках российского правового поля. Для достижения данной цели с применением формально-юридической методологии автором представлен сравнительно-правовой обзор использования современных зарубежных приложений (компьютерных программ), позволяющих обеспечить нейтральную цифровую среду для такого общения. В ходе исследования также в необходимой мере были проанализированы труды из иных областей, прежде всего психологии и социологии, что обусловлено необходимостью «тонкой настройки» межличностных отношений в рамках изучаемого сложнейшего социального института. В эссе анализируется и обосновывается необходимость создания и внедрения приложения, которое могло бы иметь условное название «Территория семейного общения и доверия» как государственной онлайн-платформы с искусственным интеллектом, позволяющей осуществлять виртуальное общение ребенка и родителя. Изучение правоприменительной практики демонстрирует, что, несмотря на предоставление современными правопорядками родителю, проживающему отдельно, права на общение и участие в воспитании ребенка, реализация этого права при сопротивлении второго родителя затруднительна, а в ряде случаев и невозможна. В работе отстаивается точка зрения о том, что доступ к платформе в некоторых случаях должен предоставляться государственным органам (например, судебным приставам), а цифровые отчеты должны получать юридическую силу доказательств. Автор приходит к выводу, что в цифровую эпоху необходимо использовать возможности технологий и искусственного интеллекта для институциональной поддержки семьи и общества, в том числе при реализации права на семейное общение и для профилактики потенциальных злоупотреблений со стороны одного из родителей.

цифровые технологииискусственный интеллектсемейное праворазводнаилучшие интересы ребенкаправо родителя на общение и воспитаниеdigital technologiesartificial intelligencefamily lawdivorcebest interests of the childright to communication and upbringingReferencesArditti, J. A., & Keith, T. Z. (1993). Visitation frequency, child support payment, and the father–child relationship postdivorce. Journal of Marriage and Family, 55(3), 699–712. https://doi.org/10.2307/353350Arditti, J. A., & Keith, T. Z. (1993). Visitation frequency, child support payment, and the father–child relationship postdivorce. Journal of Marriage and Family, 55(3), 699–712. https://doi.org/10.2307/353350Augustijn, L., Claessens, E., Miettinen, A., Hakovirta, M., Mortelmans, D., Riser, Q., & Steinbach, A. (2025). Joint physical custody and mothers' life satisfaction in Belgium, Finland, and Germany. Journal of Family Studies, 31(3), 508–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2025.2451192Augustijn, L., Claessens, E., Miettinen, A., Hakovirta, M., Mortelmans, D., Riser, Q., & Steinbach, A. (2025). Joint physical custody and mothers' life satisfaction in Belgium, Finland, and Germany. Journal of Family Studies, 31(3), 508–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2025.2451192Augustijn, L. (2022). The association between joint physical custody and children's mental health. Do children's experiences of parental loyalty conflicts moderate the relationship? Children & Society, 36, 494– 510. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12508Augustijn, L. (2022). The association between joint physical custody and children's mental health. Do children's experiences of parental loyalty conflicts moderate the relationship? Children & Society, 36, 494– 510. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12508Berman, R., & Daneback, K. (2022). Children in dual-residence arrangements: A literature review. Journal of Family Studies, 28(4), 1448–1465. https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2020.1838317Berman, R., & Daneback, K. (2022). Children in dual-residence arrangements: A literature review. Journal of Family Studies, 28(4), 1448–1465. https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2020.1838317Bergström, M., Salari, R., Hjern, A, Hognäs, R., Bergqvist, K., & Fransson, E. (2021). Importance of living arrangements and coparenting quality for young children's mental health after parental divorce: A cross-sectional parental survey. BMJ Paediatrics Open, 5(1), Article e000657. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2020-000657Bergström, M., Salari, R., Hjern, A, Hognäs, R., Bergqvist, K., & Fransson, E. (2021). Importance of living arrangements and coparenting quality for young children's mental health after parental divorce: A cross-sectional parental survey. BMJ Paediatrics Open, 5(1), Article e000657. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2020-000657Bjarnason, T., & Amarsson, A. (2011). Joint physical custody and communication with parents: A cross-national study of children in 36 western countries. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 42(6), 871–890. https://doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.42.6.871Bjarnason, T., & Amarsson, A. (2011). Joint physical custody and communication with parents: A cross-national study of children in 36 western countries. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 42(6), 871–890. https://doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.42.6.871Campbell, A. J. (2020). Children's privacy laws must be strengthened and enforced. JAMA Pediatrics, 174(12), Article e203393. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.3393Campbell, A. J. (2020). Children's privacy laws must be strengthened and enforced. JAMA Pediatrics, 174(12), Article e203393. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.3393Cancian, M., Meyer, D. R., Brown, P. R., & Cook, S. T. (2014). Who gets custody now? Dramatic changes in children's living arrangements after divorce. Demography, 51(4), 1381–1396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-014-0307-8Cancian, M., Meyer, D. R., Brown, P. R., & Cook, S. T. (2014). Who gets custody now? Dramatic changes in children's living arrangements after divorce. Demography, 51(4), 1381–1396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-014-0307-8Das, G., Cheung, C., Nebeker, C., Bietz, M., & Bloss, C. (2018). Privacy policies for apps targeted toward youth: Descriptive analysis of readability. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth, 6(1), Article e3. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.7626Das, G., Cheung, C., Nebeker, C., Bietz, M., & Bloss, C. (2018). Privacy policies for apps targeted toward youth: Descriptive analysis of readability. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth, 6(1), Article e3. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.7626Dunas, D. (2020). Sotsializatsiya i samorealizatsiya kak klyuchevyye motivy mediapotrebleniya [Socialization and self-realization as key motives of media consumption]. Medi@lmanah, (5), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.30547/mediaalmanah.5.2020.2534Dunas, D. (2020). Sotsializatsiya i samorealizatsiya kak klyuchevyye motivy mediapotrebleniya [Socialization and self-realization as key motives of media consumption]. Medi@lmanah, (5), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.30547/mediaalmanah.5.2020.2534Ermilova, A. V. (2015). Razvod glazami rebyonka: sotsiologicheskiy aspekt [Divorce through the eyes of a child: A sociological perspective]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo Universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. Seriya: Sotsial'nyye Nauki, (1), 115–120.Ermilova, A. V. (2015). Razvod glazami rebyonka: sotsiologicheskiy aspekt [Divorce through the eyes of a child: A sociological perspective]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo Universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. Seriya: Sotsial'nyye Nauki, (1), 115–120.Filippova, T. A., & Titarenko, E. P. (2022) Ispolneniye soglasheniy v semeynom prave: probely pravovogo regulirovaniya [Performance of agreements in family law: Legal regulation gaps]. Semeynoye i Zhilishchnoye Pravo, (2), 29–32. https://doi.org/10.18572/1999-477X-2022-2-29-32Filippova, T. A., & Titarenko, E. P. (2022) Ispolneniye soglasheniy v semeynom prave: probely pravovogo regulirovaniya [Performance of agreements in family law: Legal regulation gaps]. Semeynoye i Zhilishchnoye Pravo, (2), 29–32. https://doi.org/10.18572/1999-477X-2022-2-29-32Flaquer, L. (2020). Shared parenting after separation and divorce in Europe in the context of the second demographic transition. In A-. M. Castrén, V. Česnuitytė, I. Crespi, J-. A. Gauthier, R. Gouveia, C. Martin, A. M. Mínguez, K. Suwada (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of family sociology in Europe (pp. 377–398). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73306-3_19Flaquer, L. (2020). Shared parenting after separation and divorce in Europe in the context of the second demographic transition. In A-. M. Castrén, V. Česnuitytė, I. Crespi, J-. A. Gauthier, R. Gouveia, C. Martin, A. M. Mínguez, K. Suwada (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of family sociology in Europe (pp. 377–398). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73306-3_19Hakovirta, M., Meyer, D. R., Salin, M., Lindroos, E., & Haapanen, M. (2023). Joint physical custody of children in Europe: A growing phenomenon. Demographic Research, 49, 479–492. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2023.49.18Hakovirta, M., Meyer, D. R., Salin, M., Lindroos, E., & Haapanen, M. (2023). Joint physical custody of children in Europe: A growing phenomenon. Demographic Research, 49, 479–492. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2023.49.18Härkönen, J., Bernardi, F., & Boertien D. (2017). Family dynamics and child outcomes: An overview of research and open questions. European Journal of Population, 33(2), 163–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-017-9424-6Härkönen, J., Bernardi, F., & Boertien D. (2017). Family dynamics and child outcomes: An overview of research and open questions. European Journal of Population, 33(2), 163–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-017-9424-6Haux, T., & Platt, L. (2021). Fathers' involvement with their children before and after separation. European Journal of Population, 37(1), 151–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-020-09563-zHaux, T., & Platt, L. (2021). Fathers' involvement with their children before and after separation. European Journal of Population, 37(1), 151–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-020-09563-zHetherington, E. M., & Stanley-Hagan, M. H. (2002). Parenting in divorced and remarried families. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting: Being and becoming a parent (2nd ed., pp. 287–315). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Hetherington, E. M., & Stanley-Hagan, M. H. (2002). Parenting in divorced and remarried families. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting: Being and becoming a parent (2nd ed., pp. 287–315). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Helms, T., Steinbach, A., & Augustijn, L. (2023). Joint physical custody in Germany: Legal framework and results of the Family Models in Germany (FAMOD) study. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 37(1), Article ebad010. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebad010Helms, T., Steinbach, A., & Augustijn, L. (2023). Joint physical custody in Germany: Legal framework and results of the Family Models in Germany (FAMOD) study. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 37(1), Article ebad010. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebad010Kairiene, B., Valackienė, A., & Blauzdžiūnaitė-Pavlovič, J. (2022). Ensuring the child's right to communication with both parents in the context of parental divorce: A Lithuanian case study. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 24(2), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2022-0017Kairiene, B., Valackienė, A., & Blauzdžiūnaitė-Pavlovič, J. (2022). Ensuring the child's right to communication with both parents in the context of parental divorce: A Lithuanian case study. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 24(2), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2022-0017Kalmijn, M. (2013). Long-term effects of divorce on parent – child relationships: Within-family comparisons of fathers and mothers. European Sociological Review, 29(5), 888–898. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcs066/Kalmijn, M. (2013). Long-term effects of divorce on parent – child relationships: Within-family comparisons of fathers and mothers. European Sociological Review, 29(5), 888–898. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcs066/Kletsina, I. S. (2015). Situatsiya razvoda kak predmet otechestvennykh sotsiologicheskikh i sotsial'no-psikhologicheskikh issledovaniy semeynykh otnosheniy [Divorce in Russian sociological and social psychological research on family relationships]. Social Psychology and Society, 6(3), 30-45. https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2015060303Kletsina, I. S. (2015). Situatsiya razvoda kak predmet otechestvennykh sotsiologicheskikh i sotsial'no-psikhologicheskikh issledovaniy semeynykh otnosheniy [Divorce in Russian sociological and social psychological research on family relationships]. Social Psychology and Society, 6(3), 30-45. https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2015060303Marschall, A. (2017). When everyday life is double looped. Exploring children's (and parents') perspectives on post-divorce family life with two households. Children and Society, 31(5), 342–352. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12202Marschall, A. (2017). When everyday life is double looped. Exploring children's (and parents') perspectives on post-divorce family life with two households. Children and Society, 31(5), 342–352. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12202Merla L., Dedonder J., & Baar M. (2025). Judicial treatment of applications for joint physical custody in Belgium: Criteria considered and underlying family normativities. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 39(1), Article ebaf015. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebaf015Merla L., Dedonder J., & Baar M. (2025). Judicial treatment of applications for joint physical custody in Belgium: Criteria considered and underlying family normativities. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 39(1), Article ebaf015. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebaf015Murru, S., & Merla, L. (2025). Residential calendars in joint physical custody arrangements beyond the week on/week off model: Experiences of frequent alternating schedules and parental co-presence in Italy. Child & Family Social Work. 30(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/CFS.70021Murru, S., & Merla, L. (2025). Residential calendars in joint physical custody arrangements beyond the week on/week off model: Experiences of frequent alternating schedules and parental co-presence in Italy. Child & Family Social Work. 30(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/CFS.70021Meyer, D. R., Salin, M., Lindroos, E., & Hakovirta, M. (2025). Sharing responsibilities for children after separation: A European perspective. Family Transitions, 66(1–2), 27–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/28375300.2024.2423432Meyer, D. R., Salin, M., Lindroos, E., & Hakovirta, M. (2025). Sharing responsibilities for children after separation: A European perspective. Family Transitions, 66(1–2), 27–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/28375300.2024.2423432Mikhalev, A. V. (2025) Vyyavleniye modeley povedeniya molodozhi v sotsial'nykh setyakh na osnove internet-analitiki [Identification of youth behavior patterns in social networks based on internet analytics]. Prakticheskiy Marketing, (7), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.24412/2071-3762-2025-7337-22-27Mikhalev, A. V. (2025) Vyyavleniye modeley povedeniya molodozhi v sotsial'nykh setyakh na osnove internet-analitiki [Identification of youth behavior patterns in social networks based on internet analytics]. Prakticheskiy Marketing, (7), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.24412/2071-3762-2025-7337-22-27Mikheeva, L. yu. (2004). Opeka i popechitel'svo: teoriya i praktika [Custody and guardianship: Theory and practice]. Wolters Kluwer.Mikheeva, L. yu. (2004). Opeka i popechitel'svo: teoriya i praktika [Custody and guardianship: Theory and practice]. Wolters Kluwer.Institutsii Iustiniana [The Institutes of Justinian] (D. Rassner, Trans.; L. L. Kofanov & V. A. Tomsinov, Eds.). (1998). Zertsalo. (Original work published ca. 533 C. E.).Institutsii Iustiniana [The Institutes of Justinian] (D. Rassner, Trans.; L. L. Kofanov & V. A. Tomsinov, Eds.). (1998). Zertsalo. (Original work published ca. 533 C. E.).Oehme, K., O'Rourke, K. S., & Bradley, L. (2021). Online virtual supervised visitation during the COVID-19 pandemic: One state's experience. Family Court Review, 59(1), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12555Oehme, K., O'Rourke, K. S., & Bradley, L. (2021). Online virtual supervised visitation during the COVID-19 pandemic: One state's experience. Family Court Review, 59(1), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12555Olifirovich, N., Zinkevich-Kuzemkina T. A., & Velenta T. F. (2006). Psikhologiya semeynykh krizisov [Psychology of family crises]. Rech.Olifirovich, N., Zinkevich-Kuzemkina T. A., & Velenta T. F. (2006). Psikhologiya semeynykh krizisov [Psychology of family crises]. Rech.Ortega-Gaspar, M., Moreno-Mínguez, A., & López-Narbona, A. (2021). Impact of joint physical custody and best interest of the child: Reflections from a critical review of empirical studies. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 63(2), 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/10502556.2021.1993014Ortega-Gaspar, M., Moreno-Mínguez, A., & López-Narbona, A. (2021). Impact of joint physical custody and best interest of the child: Reflections from a critical review of empirical studies. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 63(2), 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/10502556.2021.1993014Palkovitz, R. (2019). Expanding our focus from father involvement to father–child relationship quality. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 11(4), 576–591. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12352Palkovitz, R. (2019). Expanding our focus from father involvement to father–child relationship quality. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 11(4), 576–591. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12352Pavlenko, E. M. (2021). Obespecheniye nailuchshikh interesov i bezopasnosti detey: mezhdunarodnyye standarty i praktika v Rossii [Ensuring the best interests and safety of children: International standards and practice in Russia]. Vestnik MGPU. Seriya: Yuridicheskiye Nauki, 4(44), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9113.2021.44.4.08Pavlenko, E. M. (2021). Obespecheniye nailuchshikh interesov i bezopasnosti detey: mezhdunarodnyye standarty i praktika v Rossii [Ensuring the best interests and safety of children: International standards and practice in Russia]. Vestnik MGPU. Seriya: Yuridicheskiye Nauki, 4(44), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9113.2021.44.4.08Payne, J. L., Smyth, B. M., Irving, M., Heard, G., & Althor, G. (2022). Family law professionals' views of post-separation parenting apps. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 36(1), Article ebac029. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebac029Payne, J. L., Smyth, B. M., Irving, M., Heard, G., & Althor, G. (2022). Family law professionals' views of post-separation parenting apps. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 36(1), Article ebac029. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebac029Perkins, K. L. (2019). Changes in household composition and children's educational attainment. Demography, 56(2), 525–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-018-0757-5Perkins, K. L. (2019). Changes in household composition and children's educational attainment. Demography, 56(2), 525–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-018-0757-5Poli, M. (2023). The impact of the best interests of the child on shared parenting and joint custody [Doctoral dissertation, University of Turin & University of Antwerp]. University of Turin Campus Repository. https://iris.unito.it/retrieve/1f0c23ad-8f6e-40f1-9938-dfdf35b2107a/Marco%20Poli_JointPhD_The%20Impact%20of%20the%20Best%20Interests%20of%20the%20Child%20%20%20on%20Shared%20Parenting%20and%20Joint%20Custody%20%20.pdfPoli, M. (2023). The impact of the best interests of the child on shared parenting and joint custody [Doctoral dissertation, University of Turin & University of Antwerp]. University of Turin Campus Repository. https://iris.unito.it/retrieve/1f0c23ad-8f6e-40f1-9938-dfdf35b2107a/Marco%20Poli_JointPhD_The%20Impact%20of%20the%20Best%20Interests%20of%20the%20Child%20%20%20on%20Shared%20Parenting%20and%20Joint%20Custody%20%20.pdfPoortman, A. R., & van Gaalen, R. (2017). Shared residence after separation: A review and new findings from the Netherlands. Family Court Review, 55(4), 531–544. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12302Poortman, A. R., & van Gaalen, R. (2017). Shared residence after separation: A review and new findings from the Netherlands. Family Court Review, 55(4), 531–544. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12302Pyankova, A. F. (2025) Opredeleniye mesta zhitel'stva rebenka: v poiskakh balansa interesov [Determining the child's place of residence: In search of a balance of interests]. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL), (7), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2025.131.7.059-067Pyankova, A. F. (2025) Opredeleniye mesta zhitel'stva rebenka: v poiskakh balansa interesov [Determining the child's place of residence: In search of a balance of interests]. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL), (7), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2025.131.7.059-067Raley, R. K., & Sweeney, M. M. (2020). Divorce, repartnering, and stepfamilies: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82(1), 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12651Raley, R. K., & Sweeney, M. M. (2020). Divorce, repartnering, and stepfamilies: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82(1), 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12651Safira, R., & Rozatul, J. (2025). The effects of parental divorce on children's self-confidence and independence. Socrates: Journal of Education, Philosophy and Psychology, 1(4), 88–93. https://doi.org/10.63217/socrates.v1i4.168Safira, R., & Rozatul, J. (2025). The effects of parental divorce on children's self-confidence and independence. Socrates: Journal of Education, Philosophy and Psychology, 1(4), 88–93. https://doi.org/10.63217/socrates.v1i4.168Saini, M., Mishna, F., Barnes, J., & Polak, S. (2013). Parenting online: An exploration of virtual parenting time in the context of separation and divorce. Journal of Child Custody, 10(2), 120–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/15379418.2013.796265Saini, M., Mishna, F., Barnes, J., & Polak, S. (2013). Parenting online: An exploration of virtual parenting time in the context of separation and divorce. Journal of Child Custody, 10(2), 120–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/15379418.2013.796265Sinelnikov, A. (2023). Sotsial'naya priyemlemost' ob'yektivnykh i sub'yektivnykh prichin dlya razvoda v sovremennoy Rossii [Social acceptability of objective and subjective reasons for divorce in modern Russia]. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya, (4), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250022703-6Sinelnikov, A. (2023). Sotsial'naya priyemlemost' ob'yektivnykh i sub'yektivnykh prichin dlya razvoda v sovremennoy Rossii [Social acceptability of objective and subjective reasons for divorce in modern Russia]. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya, (4), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250022703-6Spaan, J., van Gaalen, R., & Kalmijn, M. (2022). Disentangling the long-term effects of divorce circumstances on father-child closeness in adulthood: A mediation analysis. European Journal of Population, 38(5), 1183– 1211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-022-09636-1Spaan, J., van Gaalen, R., & Kalmijn, M. (2022). Disentangling the long-term effects of divorce circumstances on father-child closeness in adulthood: A mediation analysis. European Journal of Population, 38(5), 1183– 1211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-022-09636-1Steinsbekk, S., Bjørklund, O., Valkenburg, P., Nesi, J., & Wichstrøm, L. (2024). The new social landscape: Relationships among social media use, social skills, and offline friendships from age 10–18 years. Computers in Human Behavior, 156, Article 108235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108235Steinsbekk, S., Bjørklund, O., Valkenburg, P., Nesi, J., & Wichstrøm, L. (2024). The new social landscape: Relationships among social media use, social skills, and offline friendships from age 10–18 years. Computers in Human Behavior, 156, Article 108235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108235Steinbach, A., Augustijn, L., & Corkadi, G. (2021). Joint physical custody and adolescents' life satisfaction in 37 North American and European countries. Family Process, 60(1), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12536Steinbach, A., Augustijn, L., & Corkadi, G. (2021). Joint physical custody and adolescents' life satisfaction in 37 North American and European countries. Family Process, 60(1), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12536Steinbach, A. (2019). Children's and parents' well-being in joint physical custody: A literature review. Family Process, 58(2), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12372Steinbach, A. (2019). Children's and parents' well-being in joint physical custody: A literature review. Family Process, 58(2), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12372Temizyürek, K. (2018). Die richterliche Kindesanhörung: Bindungsfürsorge, Bindungstoleranz, Bindungsblockade [The judicial hearing of the child: Attachment caregiving, attachment tolerance, attachment blockade]. Zeitschrift für Kindschaftsrecht und Jugendhilfe, (8), 301–306. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.6126647Temizyürek, K. (2018). Die richterliche Kindesanhörung: Bindungsfürsorge, Bindungstoleranz, Bindungsblockade [The judicial hearing of the child: Attachment caregiving, attachment tolerance, attachment blockade]. Zeitschrift für Kindschaftsrecht und Jugendhilfe, (8), 301–306. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.6126647Toews, M. L., & McKenry, P. C. (2001). Court-related predictors of parental cooperation and conflict after divorce. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 35(1–2), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1300/J087v35n01_03Toews, M. L., & McKenry, P. C. (2001). Court-related predictors of parental cooperation and conflict after divorce. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 35(1–2), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1300/J087v35n01_03Van Spijker, F., Kalmijn, M., & van Gaalen R. (2022). The long-term improvement in father–child relationships after divorce: Descriptive findings from the Netherlands. Demographic Research, 46(15), 441–452. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2022.46.15Van Spijker, F., Kalmijn, M., & van Gaalen R. (2022). The long-term improvement in father–child relationships after divorce: Descriptive findings from the Netherlands. Demographic Research, 46(15), 441–452. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2022.46.15Zartler, U. (2021). Children and parents after separation. In N. F. Schneider and M. Kreyenfeld (Eds.), Research handbook on the sociology of the family (pp. 300–313). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788975544.00029Zartler, U. (2021). Children and parents after separation. In N. F. Schneider and M. Kreyenfeld (Eds.), Research handbook on the sociology of the family (pp. 300–313). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788975544.00029

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.