dirightDigital Law JournalЦифровое право2686-9136Maxim Inozemtsev10.38044/2686-9136-2024-5-3-5diright-263Research ArticleARTICLESСТАТЬИLegal Regime of AI-Generated OutputsПравовой режим результатов, создаваемых генеративным искусственным интеллектомhttps://orcid.org/0009-0007-5628-366XСамарцеваМ. В.SamartsevaM. V.

советник, руководитесь практики интеллектуальной собственности и технологии; соискатель ученой степени кандидата юридических наук; член Комиссии по интеллектуальной собственности при Международной Торговой Палате в России; вице-президент IP-Club

127051, Москва, Цветной бульвар, 2;

117279, Москва, ул. Миклухо-Маклая, 55а

Maria V. Samartseva — Counsel, Head of Intellectual Property and Technology Practice; Ph.D. in Law candidate; IP Committee member at ICC Russia; Vice-President of IP CLUB

2, Tsvetnoy Boulevard, Moscow, 127051 

55a, Miklukho-Maklaya str., Moscow, 117279 

Mvsamartseva@yandex.ruЮридическая фирма «Дякин, Горцунян и Партнеры» ; Российская государственная академия интеллектуальной собственности (РГАИС)РоссияDyakin, Gortsunyan and Partners ; Russian State Academy of Intellectual Property (RGAIS)Russian Federation202426072025531965Copyright © Samartseva M.V., 20252025Самарцева М.В.Samartseva M.V.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.digitallawjournal.org/jour/article/view/263

The article is devoted to the study of the legal nature of generative artificial intelligence and its impact on copyright. It examines the features of generative artificial intelligence, which is capable of creating new content in response to user requests (prompts). The focus is on the legal evaluation of results generated using artificial intelligence technologies (the AI outputs) and their comparison with the results of intellectual activity created by humans. The article analyzes the criteria for the protectability of such AI results in the context of Russian legislation and existing international approaches. The author emphasizes that the results of AI created without human participation, within the meaning of the law, cannot be recognized as objects of copyright under Russian Federation law due to the lack of creative contribution and direct human involvement in their creation. Instead, it is proposed to develop a special legal regime for such objects—AI results—that will ensure their economic value and legal protection. Possible legal mechanisms are also considered as tools to protect the results created using AI, provided that there is a significant human creative contribution. The article emphasizes the need for a clear distinction between objects created by AI autonomously, without human participation, and objects created as a result of human creative activity using AI as a creative tool. The author offers regulatory provisions for the regulation of property rights to results generated by AI and considers the prospects for the development of legislation in this area.

Статья посвящена исследованию правовой природы генеративного искусственного интеллекта и его влияния на авторское право. В ней рассматриваются особенности генеративного искусственного интеллекта, который способен создавать новый контент в ответ на запросы пользователей (промпты). Основное внимание уделяется правовой оценке результатов, сгенерированных с использованием технологий искусственного интеллекта (результатов ИИ), и их сопоставлению с результатами интеллектуальной деятельности, созданными человеком. В статье анализируются критерии охраноспособности таких результатов ИИ в контексте российского законодательства и имеющиеся международные подходы. Автор акцентирует внимание на том, что результаты ИИ, созданные без участия человека, по смыслу закона не могут быть признаны объектами авторских прав по праву Российской Федерации из-за отсутствия творческого вклада и непосредственного участия человека в их создании. Вместо этого предлагается разработка специального правового режима для таких объектов — результатов ИИ, который обеспечит их экономическую ценность и правовую охрану. Также рассматриваются возможные правовые механизмы в качестве инструментов для защиты результатов, созданных с использованием ИИ, при условии наличия значительного творческого вклада человека. Статья подчеркивает необходимость четкого разграничения между объектами, созданными ИИ автономно, без участия человека, и объектами, созданными в результате творческой деятельности человека с использованием ИИ в качестве творческого инструмента. Автор предлагает нормативные положения для регулирования имущественных прав на результаты, сгенерированные ИИ, и рассматривает перспективы развития законодательства в этой области.

генеративный искусственный интеллектавторское правопромптрезультат генерациирезультаты ИИрезультаты интеллектуальной деятельноститворческий вкладслабый ИИоператор ИИинтеллектуальная собственностьgenerative artificial intelligencecopyrightpromptgenerative resultAI resultsresults of intellectual activitycreative contributionweak AIAI operatorintellectual propertyReferencesAvershina, M. V. (2023). Tvorchestvo i iskusstvennyj intellekt [Creativity and artificial intelligence]. Vestnik Luganskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni Vladimira Dalya, S1, 201–209.Avershina, M. V. (2023). Tvorchestvo i iskusstvennyj intellekt [Creativity and artificial intelligence]. Vestnik Luganskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni Vladimira Dalya, S1, 201–209.Balashova, A. I. (2022). Iskusstvennyj intellekt v avtorskom i patentnom prave: Ob”ekty, sub”ektnyj sostav pravootnoshenij, sroki pravovoj ohrany [Artificial intelligence in copyright and patent law: Objects, subjects of legal relations, terms of protection]. Zhurnal Suda po Intellektual’nym Pravam, (2), 90–98.Balashova, A. I. (2022). Iskusstvennyj intellekt v avtorskom i patentnom prave: Ob”ekty, sub”ektnyj sostav pravootnoshenij, sroki pravovoj ohrany [Artificial intelligence in copyright and patent law: Objects, subjects of legal relations, terms of protection]. Zhurnal Suda po Intellektual’nym Pravam, (2), 90–98.Balashova, A. I. (2023). Pravovoj rezhim rezul’tatov deyatel’nosti iskusstvennogo intellekta: Edinstvo i differenciaciya podhodov [The legal regime of artificial intelligence activity results: Unity and differentiation of approaches]. Zhurnal Suda po Intellektual’nym Pravam, (3), 190–206. https://doi.org/10.58741/23134852_2023_3_20Balashova, A. I. (2023). Pravovoj rezhim rezul’tatov deyatel’nosti iskusstvennogo intellekta: Edinstvo i differenciaciya podhodov [The legal regime of artificial intelligence activity results: Unity and differentiation of approaches]. Zhurnal Suda po Intellektual’nym Pravam, (3), 190–206. https://doi.org/10.58741/23134852_2023_3_20Bøhler, H. M. (2017). EU copyright protection of works created by artificial intelligence systems [Master thesis, University of Bergen]. https://bora.uib.no/bora-xmlui/handle/1956/16479Bøhler, H. M. (2017). EU copyright protection of works created by artificial intelligence systems [Master thesis, University of Bergen]. https://bora.uib.no/bora-xmlui/handle/1956/16479Bonadio, E., Mcdonagh, L., & Arvidsson, C. (2018). Intellectual property aspects of robotics. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 9(4), 655–676. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2018.58Bonadio, E., Mcdonagh, L., & Arvidsson, C. (2018). Intellectual property aspects of robotics. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 9(4), 655–676. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2018.58Burstyn, N. F. (2016). Creative sparks: Works of nature, selection, and the human author. The Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 39(2), 281–310. https://doi.org/10.7916/jla.v39i2.2089Burstyn, N. F. (2016). Creative sparks: Works of nature, selection, and the human author. The Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 39(2), 281–310. https://doi.org/10.7916/jla.v39i2.2089Cappelli, M. A. (2015). Regulation on safety and civil Liability of intelligent autonomous robots: The case of smart Cars [Doctoral dissertation, University of Trento]. http://eprints-phd.biblio.unitn.it/1632/Cappelli, M. A. (2015). Regulation on safety and civil Liability of intelligent autonomous robots: The case of smart Cars [Doctoral dissertation, University of Trento]. http://eprints-phd.biblio.unitn.it/1632/Dickenson, J., Morgan, A., & Clark, B. (2017). Creative machines: Ownership of copyright in content by artificial intelligence applications. European Intellectual Property Review, 39(8), 457–460.Dickenson, J., Morgan, A., & Clark, B. (2017). Creative machines: Ownership of copyright in content by artificial intelligence applications. European Intellectual Property Review, 39(8), 457–460.Dovgalyuk, A., & Glonina, V. (2018). Pererabotka proizvedeniya vs «parallel’noe» tvorchestvo: Ponyatie, kriterii razgranicheniya [Reproduction of a work vs “parallel” creative work: Concept, criteria of differentiation]. Zhurnal Rossijskoj Shkoly Chastnogo Prava, (3), 175–197.Dovgalyuk, A., & Glonina, V. (2018). Pererabotka proizvedeniya vs «parallel’noe» tvorchestvo: Ponyatie, kriterii razgranicheniya [Reproduction of a work vs “parallel” creative work: Concept, criteria of differentiation]. Zhurnal Rossijskoj Shkoly Chastnogo Prava, (3), 175–197.Evteeva, E. V. (2022). Okhranosposobnost’ ob”ektov, sozdannykh iskusstvennym intellektom: teoreticheskoe obobshchenie [Protectability of AI-generated objects: A theoretical synthesis]. Zhurnal Suda po Intellektual’nym Pravam, (3), 97–110.Evteeva, E. V. (2022). Okhranosposobnost’ ob”ektov, sozdannykh iskusstvennym intellektom: teoreticheskoe obobshchenie [Protectability of AI-generated objects: A theoretical synthesis]. Zhurnal Suda po Intellektual’nym Pravam, (3), 97–110.Gurko, A.B. (2017). Iskusstvennyj intellekt i avtorskoe pravo: Vzglyad v budushchee [Artificial intelligence and copyright: A look into the future]. Zhurnal “I.S. Avtorskoe Pravo i Smezhnye Prava”, 12, 7–18.Gurko, A.B. (2017). Iskusstvennyj intellekt i avtorskoe pravo: Vzglyad v budushchee [Artificial intelligence and copyright: A look into the future]. Zhurnal “I.S. Avtorskoe Pravo i Smezhnye Prava”, 12, 7–18.Hristov, K. (2020). Artificial intelligence and the copyright survey. Journal of Science Policy & Governance, 16(1). https://www.sciencepolicyjournal.org/uploads/5/4/3/4/5434385/hristov_jspg_v16.pdfHristov, K. (2020). Artificial intelligence and the copyright survey. Journal of Science Policy & Governance, 16(1). https://www.sciencepolicyjournal.org/uploads/5/4/3/4/5434385/hristov_jspg_v16.pdfHutson, J. (2024). The evolving role of copyright law in the age of AI-generated works. Journal of Digital Technologies and Law, 2(4), 886–914. https://doi.org/10.21202/jdtl.2024.43Hutson, J. (2024). The evolving role of copyright law in the age of AI-generated works. Journal of Digital Technologies and Law, 2(4), 886–914. https://doi.org/10.21202/jdtl.2024.43Ionas, V. Ya. (1963). Kriteriy tvorchestva v avtorskom prave i sudebnoy praktike [The criterion of creativity in copyright law and judicial practice]. Yuridicheskaya literatura.Ionas, V. Ya. (1963). Kriteriy tvorchestva v avtorskom prave i sudebnoy praktike [The criterion of creativity in copyright law and judicial practice]. Yuridicheskaya literatura.Ionas, V. Ya. (1972). Proizvedeniya tvorchestva v grazhdanskom prave [Works of creativity in civil law]. Yuridicheskaya literatura.Ionas, V. Ya. (1972). Proizvedeniya tvorchestva v grazhdanskom prave [Works of creativity in civil law]. Yuridicheskaya literatura.Isaeva, O. V. (2023a). Original’nost’ proizvedeniya kak kriterij ohranosposobnosti [Originality of a work as a criterion for its protectability]. Trudy po Intellectualnoy Sobstvennosti [Works on Intellectual Property], 44(1), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.17323/tis.2023.16882Isaeva, O. V. (2023a). Original’nost’ proizvedeniya kak kriterij ohranosposobnosti [Originality of a work as a criterion for its protectability]. Trudy po Intellectualnoy Sobstvennosti [Works on Intellectual Property], 44(1), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.17323/tis.2023.16882Isaeva, O. V. (2023b). Predely svobody avtora proizvodnogo proizvedeniya [Limits on the freedom of the author of a derivative work] [Ph.D. Thesis, Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation].Isaeva, O. V. (2023b). Predely svobody avtora proizvodnogo proizvedeniya [Limits on the freedom of the author of a derivative work] [Ph.D. Thesis, Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation].Ivanov, N. V. (2020). Avtorskie i smezhnye prava v muzyke [Copyright and related rights in music] (A. P. Sergeev, Ed.; 2nd ed.). Prospekt.Ivanov, N. V. (2020). Avtorskie i smezhnye prava v muzyke [Copyright and related rights in music] (A. P. Sergeev, Ed.; 2nd ed.). Prospekt.Kashanin, A. V. (2007). Problema minimal’nykh standartov ohranosposobnosti proizvedenij v avtorskom prave. Germanskij opyt [The problem of minimum standards of copyrightability in copyright law: The German experience]. Vestnik Grazhdanskogo Prava, (4), 23–62.Kashanin, A. V. (2007). Problema minimal’nykh standartov ohranosposobnosti proizvedenij v avtorskom prave. Germanskij opyt [The problem of minimum standards of copyrightability in copyright law: The German experience]. Vestnik Grazhdanskogo Prava, (4), 23–62.Kashanin, A. V. (2010). Minimal’nyj uroven’ tvorcheskogo kharaktera proizvedenij v avtorskom prave Francii [Works with minimum authorship level in French copyright]. Law Journal of the Higher School of Economics, (1), 114–124. https://law-journal.hse.ru/article/view/20644Kashanin, A. V. (2010). Minimal’nyj uroven’ tvorcheskogo kharaktera proizvedenij v avtorskom prave Francii [Works with minimum authorship level in French copyright]. Law Journal of the Higher School of Economics, (1), 114–124. https://law-journal.hse.ru/article/view/20644Kashtanova, P. A. (2023). Perspektivy pravovoj okhrany proizvedenij, sozdavaemykh s ispol’zovaniem iskusstvennogo intellekta v Rossii. Zhurnal Suda po Intellektual’nym Pravam, (1), 120–132. https://doi.org/10.58741/23134852_2023_1_120Kashtanova, P. A. (2023). Perspektivy pravovoj okhrany proizvedenij, sozdavaemykh s ispol’zovaniem iskusstvennogo intellekta v Rossii. Zhurnal Suda po Intellektual’nym Pravam, (1), 120–132. https://doi.org/10.58741/23134852_2023_1_120Kharitonova, Y. S., & Savina, V. S. (2020). Tekhonologiya iskusstvennogo intellekta i pravo: Vyzovy sovremennosti [Artificial intelligence technology and law: Challenges of our time]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki [Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences], (49), 524–549. https://doi.org/10.17072/19954190-2020-49-524-549Kharitonova, Y. S., & Savina, V. S. (2020). Tekhonologiya iskusstvennogo intellekta i pravo: Vyzovy sovremennosti [Artificial intelligence technology and law: Challenges of our time]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki [Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences], (49), 524–549. https://doi.org/10.17072/19954190-2020-49-524-549Kirpichev, A. E. (2024). Prompts for generative artificial intelligence in legal discours. RUDN Journal of Law, 28(4), 906–918. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2337-2024-28-4-906-918Kirpichev, A. E. (2024). Prompts for generative artificial intelligence in legal discours. RUDN Journal of Law, 28(4), 906–918. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2337-2024-28-4-906-918Komashko, M. N. (2024). ChatGPT, tekst, informaciya: kriticheskij analiz [ChatGPT, text, information: Critical analysis]. Trudi po Intellectualnoy Sobstvennosti (Works on Intellectual Property), 50(3), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.17323/tis.2024.22306Komashko, M. N. (2024). ChatGPT, tekst, informaciya: kriticheskij analiz [ChatGPT, text, information: Critical analysis]. Trudi po Intellectualnoy Sobstvennosti (Works on Intellectual Property), 50(3), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.17323/tis.2024.22306Kopylov, A. Y. (2019). Tvorchestvo kak uslovie ohranosposobnosti proizvedeniya [Creativity as a condition for copyrightability of a work]. Imushchestvennye Otnosheniya v Rossijskoj Federacii, (12), 56–62. https://doi.org/10.24411/2072-4098-2019-11204Kopylov, A. Y. (2019). Tvorchestvo kak uslovie ohranosposobnosti proizvedeniya [Creativity as a condition for copyrightability of a work]. Imushchestvennye Otnosheniya v Rossijskoj Federacii, (12), 56–62. https://doi.org/10.24411/2072-4098-2019-11204Kopylov, A. Y. (2020). Spetsifika tvorchestva v proizvedeniyah nauki, literatury i iskusstva kak usloviya predostavleniya im avtorsko-pravovoj okhrany [The specifics of creativity in the works of science, literature, and art as a condition for granting copyright protection to these works]. Epomen Scientific Journal, (41), 308–319. https://epomen.ru/issues/2020/41/24.pdfKopylov, A. Y. (2020). Spetsifika tvorchestva v proizvedeniyah nauki, literatury i iskusstva kak usloviya predostavleniya im avtorsko-pravovoj okhrany [The specifics of creativity in the works of science, literature, and art as a condition for granting copyright protection to these works]. Epomen Scientific Journal, (41), 308–319. https://epomen.ru/issues/2020/41/24.pdfKorolkova, D. A. (2024). Programmy iskusstvennogo intellekta i ikh klassifikaciya: Grazhdansko-pravovoj podhod [Artificial intelligence programs and their classification: A civil law approach]. Zakon i Pravo [Law & Legislation], 8, 146–152. https://doi.org/10.24412/2073-3313-2024-8-146-152Korolkova, D. A. (2024). Programmy iskusstvennogo intellekta i ikh klassifikaciya: Grazhdansko-pravovoj podhod [Artificial intelligence programs and their classification: A civil law approach]. Zakon i Pravo [Law & Legislation], 8, 146–152. https://doi.org/10.24412/2073-3313-2024-8-146-152Kositsky, A. O. (2023). Tvorchestvo kak kriterij okhranosposobnosti ob”ektov avtorskikh prav: Samostoyatel’noe sozdanie i tvorcheskij kharakter. Uroven’ tvorcheskogo kharaktera [Originality: Independent creation and creativity. Level of creativity]. Zhurnal Suda po Intellektual‘nym Pravam, (4), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.58741/23134852_2023_4_7Kositsky, A. O. (2023). Tvorchestvo kak kriterij okhranosposobnosti ob”ektov avtorskikh prav: Samostoyatel’noe sozdanie i tvorcheskij kharakter. Uroven’ tvorcheskogo kharaktera [Originality: Independent creation and creativity. Level of creativity]. Zhurnal Suda po Intellektual‘nym Pravam, (4), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.58741/23134852_2023_4_7Krasavchikov, O. A. (1958). Yuridicheskie fakty v sovetskom grazhdanskom prave [Legal facts in Soviet civil law]. Gosyurizdat.Krasavchikov, O. A. (1958). Yuridicheskie fakty v sovetskom grazhdanskom prave [Legal facts in Soviet civil law]. Gosyurizdat.Kukhno, M. O. (2023). Iskusstvennyj intellekt — novyj sub»ekt avtorskogo prava: Nedalekoe budushchee ili fikciya? [Artificial intelligence is a new subject of copyright: the near future or fiction?] Zhurnal Suda po Intellektual‘nym Pravam, (3), 72–86. https://doi.org/10.58741/23134852_2023_3_8Kukhno, M. O. (2023). Iskusstvennyj intellekt — novyj sub»ekt avtorskogo prava: Nedalekoe budushchee ili fikciya? [Artificial intelligence is a new subject of copyright: the near future or fiction?] Zhurnal Suda po Intellektual‘nym Pravam, (3), 72–86. https://doi.org/10.58741/23134852_2023_3_8Li, Y. (2023). Normativno-pravovoe regulirovanie generativnogo iskusstvennogo intellekta v Velikobritanii, SShA, Evropejskom soyuze i Kitae [Specifics of regulatory and legal regulation of generative artificial intelligence in the UK, USA, EU and China]. Law Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 16(3), 245–267. https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2023.3.245.267Li, Y. (2023). Normativno-pravovoe regulirovanie generativnogo iskusstvennogo intellekta v Velikobritanii, SShA, Evropejskom soyuze i Kitae [Specifics of regulatory and legal regulation of generative artificial intelligence in the UK, USA, EU and China]. Law Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 16(3), 245–267. https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2023.3.245.267Lutkova, O. V. (2017). Transgranichnye avtorskie otnosheniya neisklyuchitel’nogo haraktera: Material’no-pravovoe i kollizionno-pravovoe regulirovanie [Cross-border non-exclusive copyright relations: Substantive and conflict of laws regulation]. Prospekt.Lutkova, O. V. (2017). Transgranichnye avtorskie otnosheniya neisklyuchitel’nogo haraktera: Material’no-pravovoe i kollizionno-pravovoe regulirovanie [Cross-border non-exclusive copyright relations: Substantive and conflict of laws regulation]. Prospekt.Machanov, D. N. (2020). Kriterii tvorcheskoj deyatel’nosti ili vklada ob»ektov avtorskogo prava, sozdannyh iskusstvennym intellektom [Criteria for creative activity or contribution of copyright objects created by artificial intelligence]. Obrazovanie i pravo, 2, 333–335. https://doi.org/10.24411/2076-1503-2020-10260Machanov, D. N. (2020). Kriterii tvorcheskoj deyatel’nosti ili vklada ob»ektov avtorskogo prava, sozdannyh iskusstvennym intellektom [Criteria for creative activity or contribution of copyright objects created by artificial intelligence]. Obrazovanie i pravo, 2, 333–335. https://doi.org/10.24411/2076-1503-2020-10260Mikhailov, S. V. (2021). Prezumpciya tvorcheskogo haraktera (original’nosti) ob”ektov avtorskih prav [The presumption of a creative nature (originality) of copyright objects]. Lex Russica, 10(74), 9–25. https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2021.179.10.009-025Mikhailov, S. V. (2021). Prezumpciya tvorcheskogo haraktera (original’nosti) ob”ektov avtorskih prav [The presumption of a creative nature (originality) of copyright objects]. Lex Russica, 10(74), 9–25. https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2021.179.10.009-025Milyukov, S. A. (2025). Ob"ekty, sozdannye s ispol’zovaniem iskusstvennogo intellekta kak ob"ekty avtorskikh i smezhnykh prav [Objects generated by neural networks as an object of copyright and related rights]. Zhurnal Suda po Intellektual’nym Pravam, (1), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.58741/23134852_2025_1_6Milyukov, S. A. (2025). Ob"ekty, sozdannye s ispol’zovaniem iskusstvennogo intellekta kak ob"ekty avtorskikh i smezhnykh prav [Objects generated by neural networks as an object of copyright and related rights]. Zhurnal Suda po Intellektual’nym Pravam, (1), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.58741/23134852_2025_1_6Morkhat, P. M. (2018a). Sistema iskusstvennogo intellekta kak sub"ekt avtorskogo i patentnogo prava [Artificial intelligence systems as subjects of copyright and patent law]. Copyright (Bulletin of the Academy of Intellectual Property), (3), 82–92.Morkhat, P. M. (2018a). Sistema iskusstvennogo intellekta kak sub"ekt avtorskogo i patentnogo prava [Artificial intelligence systems as subjects of copyright and patent law]. Copyright (Bulletin of the Academy of Intellectual Property), (3), 82–92.Morkhat, P. M. (2018b). Pravosub”ektnost’ iskusstvennogo intellekta v sfere prava intellektual’noj sobstvennosti: Grazhdansko-pravovye problemy [Legal personality of artificial intelligence in the sphere of intellectual property law: Civil law problems] [Ph.D. Thesis]. Rossijskaya Gosudarstvennaya Akademiya Intellektual’noj Sobstvennosti.Morkhat, P. M. (2018b). Pravosub”ektnost’ iskusstvennogo intellekta v sfere prava intellektual’noj sobstvennosti: Grazhdansko-pravovye problemy [Legal personality of artificial intelligence in the sphere of intellectual property law: Civil law problems] [Ph.D. Thesis]. Rossijskaya Gosudarstvennaya Akademiya Intellektual’noj Sobstvennosti.Motovilova, D. A. (2019). Perspektivy avtorsko-pravovoj zashchity rezul’tatov, sozdannyh sistemami iskusstvennogo intellekta, s pozicii amerikanskogo prava [Prospects for copyright protection of AI-generated outputs: A U.S. legal perspective]. Zhurnal Suda po Intellektual’nym Pravam, (1), 56–67. https://ipcmagazine.ru/files/ipcmagazine/1/4/1735741/journal032019.pdfMotovilova, D. A. (2019). Perspektivy avtorsko-pravovoj zashchity rezul’tatov, sozdannyh sistemami iskusstvennogo intellekta, s pozicii amerikanskogo prava [Prospects for copyright protection of AI-generated outputs: A U.S. legal perspective]. Zhurnal Suda po Intellektual’nym Pravam, (1), 56–67. https://ipcmagazine.ru/files/ipcmagazine/1/4/1735741/journal032019.pdfNaumov, V. B., & Tytiuk, E. V. (2018). K voprosu o pravovom statuse «tvorchestva» iskusstvennogo intellekta [On the legal status of the “art” of the artificial intelligence]. Pravovedenie, 62(3), 531–540. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu25.2018.307Naumov, V. B., & Tytiuk, E. V. (2018). K voprosu o pravovom statuse «tvorchestva» iskusstvennogo intellekta [On the legal status of the “art” of the artificial intelligence]. Pravovedenie, 62(3), 531–540. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu25.2018.307Nazarov, N. A. (2022). Mashinnoe tvorchestvo i pravo: Dve chasti odnogo tselogo [Machine creativity and the law: Two parts of a whole]. Trudy po Intellectualnoy Sobstvennosti [Works on Intellectual Property], 43(4), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.17323/tis.2022.16358Nazarov, N. A. (2022). Mashinnoe tvorchestvo i pravo: Dve chasti odnogo tselogo [Machine creativity and the law: Two parts of a whole]. Trudy po Intellectualnoy Sobstvennosti [Works on Intellectual Property], 43(4), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.17323/tis.2022.16358Novoselova, L. A. (Ed.). (2017). Pravo intellektual’noy sobstvennosti: Uchebnik [Intellectual property law: Textbook] (Vol. 2. Avtorskoe pravo [Copyright law]). Statut.Novoselova, L. A. (Ed.). (2017). Pravo intellektual’noy sobstvennosti: Uchebnik [Intellectual property law: Textbook] (Vol. 2. Avtorskoe pravo [Copyright law]). Statut.Ogorodnikova, K. S. (2021). Problema original’nosti proizvedeniya v avtorskom prava [The problem of the originality of a work in copyright]. Voprosy rossijskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava [Matters of Russian and International Law], 11A(11), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.34670/AR.2021.97.15.007Ogorodnikova, K. S. (2021). Problema original’nosti proizvedeniya v avtorskom prava [The problem of the originality of a work in copyright]. Voprosy rossijskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava [Matters of Russian and International Law], 11A(11), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.34670/AR.2021.97.15.007Pankratova, L. S. (2019). Eticheskie problemy i politika regulirovaniya vnedreniya tekhnologij iskusstvennogo intellekta v servisy onlajn-znakomstv [Ethical problems and regulation policy of artificial intelligence technologies implementation in online dating services]. Azimut Nauchnykh Issledovanij: Ekonomika i Upravlenie [Azimuth of Scientific Research: Economics and Administration], 8(4), 47–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.26140/anie-2019-0804-0094Pankratova, L. S. (2019). Eticheskie problemy i politika regulirovaniya vnedreniya tekhnologij iskusstvennogo intellekta v servisy onlajn-znakomstv [Ethical problems and regulation policy of artificial intelligence technologies implementation in online dating services]. Azimut Nauchnykh Issledovanij: Ekonomika i Upravlenie [Azimuth of Scientific Research: Economics and Administration], 8(4), 47–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.26140/anie-2019-0804-0094Pasternak, V. S. (2021). Kriterij tvorchestva i problema malotvorcheskih proizvedenij v avtorskom prave [The criterion of creativity and the problem of low-creativity works in copyright law]. In E. P. Gavrilov & S. V. Butenko (Eds.), Intellektual’nye prava: Vyzovy XXI veka: Sbornik dokladov III Mezhdunarodnoj konferencii (pp. 43–49).Pasternak, V. S. (2021). Kriterij tvorchestva i problema malotvorcheskih proizvedenij v avtorskom prave [The criterion of creativity and the problem of low-creativity works in copyright law]. In E. P. Gavrilov & S. V. Butenko (Eds.), Intellektual’nye prava: Vyzovy XXI veka: Sbornik dokladov III Mezhdunarodnoj konferencii (pp. 43–49).Popova, A. V., & Kiselevskaya, L. E. (2018). Kontspetsia postcheloveka — novyj diskurs XXI v. [The posthuman concept — a new discourse of the 21st century]. Istoriya i Sovremennost, 3, 51–65. https://doi.org/10.30884/iis/2018.03.03Popova, A. V., & Kiselevskaya, L. E. (2018). Kontspetsia postcheloveka — novyj diskurs XXI v. [The posthuman concept — a new discourse of the 21st century]. Istoriya i Sovremennost, 3, 51–65. https://doi.org/10.30884/iis/2018.03.03Rakhmatullina, R. Sh. (2013). Tvorcheskij i netvorcheskij aspekt ob”ektov intellektual’noj sobstvennosti [Creative and non-creative aspect of intellectual property objects]. In Konvergenciya chastnogo i publichnogo prava: Problemy sovershenstvovaniya sovremennogo zakonodatel’stva: Sbornik materialov Vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii, posvyashchennoj pamyati zasluzhennogo yurista RF, dokt. Yurid. Nauk, prof. N.M. Korshunova (pp. 217–220).Rakhmatullina, R. Sh. (2013). Tvorcheskij i netvorcheskij aspekt ob”ektov intellektual’noj sobstvennosti [Creative and non-creative aspect of intellectual property objects]. In Konvergenciya chastnogo i publichnogo prava: Problemy sovershenstvovaniya sovremennogo zakonodatel’stva: Sbornik materialov Vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii, posvyashchennoj pamyati zasluzhennogo yurista RF, dokt. Yurid. Nauk, prof. N.M. Korshunova (pp. 217–220).Rozhkova, M. A. (2010). Teorii yuridicheskih faktov grazhdanskogo i processual’nogo prava: Ponyatiya, klassifikacii, osnovy vzaimodejstviya [Theories of legal facts of civil and procedural law: Concepts, classifications, bases of interaction] [Dr.Sci. Thesis, Russian Academy of Public Service].Rozhkova, M. A. (2010). Teorii yuridicheskih faktov grazhdanskogo i processual’nogo prava: Ponyatiya, klassifikacii, osnovy vzaimodejstviya [Theories of legal facts of civil and procedural law: Concepts, classifications, bases of interaction] [Dr.Sci. Thesis, Russian Academy of Public Service].Rozhkova, M. A. (2024a). 5 priznakov (kriteriev ohranosposobnosti) proizvedenij nauki, zakreplennykh dejstvuyushchim zakonodatel’stvom [5 attributes (criteria of protectability) of works of science enshrined in the current legislation]. Zhurnal Suda po Intellektual’nym Pravam, (2), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.58741/23134852_2024_2_8Rozhkova, M. A. (2024a). 5 priznakov (kriteriev ohranosposobnosti) proizvedenij nauki, zakreplennykh dejstvuyushchim zakonodatel’stvom [5 attributes (criteria of protectability) of works of science enshrined in the current legislation]. Zhurnal Suda po Intellektual’nym Pravam, (2), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.58741/23134852_2024_2_8Rozhkova, M. A. (2024b). 5 priznakov (kriteriev ohranosposobnosti) proizvedenij literatury i iskusstva, zakreplennyh dejstvuyushchim zakonodatel’stvom [5 attributes (criteria of protectability) of works of literature and art enshrined in the current legislation]. Zhurnal Suda po Intellektual’nym pravam, (1), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.58741/23134852_2024_1_4Rozhkova, M. A. (2024b). 5 priznakov (kriteriev ohranosposobnosti) proizvedenij literatury i iskusstva, zakreplennyh dejstvuyushchim zakonodatel’stvom [5 attributes (criteria of protectability) of works of literature and art enshrined in the current legislation]. Zhurnal Suda po Intellektual’nym pravam, (1), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.58741/23134852_2024_1_4Rozhkova, M. A., & Isaeva, O. V. (2021). Pravovye rezhimy fotografii v rossijskom prave [Legal regime of photography in Russian law]. Zhurnal Suda po Intellektual’nym Pravam, (2), 55–69.Rozhkova, M. A., & Isaeva, O. V. (2021). Pravovye rezhimy fotografii v rossijskom prave [Legal regime of photography in Russian law]. Zhurnal Suda po Intellektual’nym Pravam, (2), 55–69.Rozhkova, M. A., & Isaeva, O. V. (2023). Kvalifikaciya v kachestve proizvodnyh proizvedenij ob”ektov, sozdavaemyh na osnove rezul’tatov mashinnogo obucheniya i «proizvedenij» iskusstvennogo intellekta [Qualification as derivative works of objects created using the results of machine learning and artificial intelligence “works”]. In M. A. Rozhkova (Ed.), Intellektual’nye prava v cifrovuyu epohu: Izbrannye aspekty. Vypusk 19 (pp. 153–172). GAUGN Press. https://rozhkova.com/pdf/19-AI-2023.pdfRozhkova, M. A., & Isaeva, O. V. (2023). Kvalifikaciya v kachestve proizvodnyh proizvedenij ob”ektov, sozdavaemyh na osnove rezul’tatov mashinnogo obucheniya i «proizvedenij» iskusstvennogo intellekta [Qualification as derivative works of objects created using the results of machine learning and artificial intelligence “works”]. In M. A. Rozhkova (Ed.), Intellektual’nye prava v cifrovuyu epohu: Izbrannye aspekty. Vypusk 19 (pp. 153–172). GAUGN Press. https://rozhkova.com/pdf/19-AI-2023.pdfSerebrovskij, V. I. (1956). Voprosy sovetskogo avtorskogo prava (P. E. Orlovskij, Ed.). Izdatel’stvo AN SSSR.Serebrovskij, V. I. (1956). Voprosy sovetskogo avtorskogo prava (P. E. Orlovskij, Ed.). Izdatel’stvo AN SSSR.Sesitsky, E. P. (2018). Problemy pravovoj ohrany rezul’tatov, sozdavaemyh sistemami iskusstvennogo intellekta [Problems of legal protection of works created by artificial intelligence systems] [Ph.D. Thesis, Rossijskaya Gosudarstvennaya Akademiya Intellektual’noj Sobstvennosti].Sesitsky, E. P. (2018). Problemy pravovoj ohrany rezul’tatov, sozdavaemyh sistemami iskusstvennogo intellekta [Problems of legal protection of works created by artificial intelligence systems] [Ph.D. Thesis, Rossijskaya Gosudarstvennaya Akademiya Intellektual’noj Sobstvennosti].Shakhnazarova, E. A. (2021). Pravovoe regulirovanie otnoshenij, voznikayushchih po povodu ob”ektov intellektual’noj sobstvennosti, sozdannyh tekhnologiej iskusstvennogo intellekta, na primere opyta Velikobritanii, SShA i ES [Legal regulation of relations emerging from intellectual property, created by artificial intelligence technology on the example of the experience of the UK, USA and the EU]. Zhurnal Suda po Intellektual’nym Pravam, (2), 34–45.Shakhnazarova, E. A. (2021). Pravovoe regulirovanie otnoshenij, voznikayushchih po povodu ob”ektov intellektual’noj sobstvennosti, sozdannyh tekhnologiej iskusstvennogo intellekta, na primere opyta Velikobritanii, SShA i ES [Legal regulation of relations emerging from intellectual property, created by artificial intelligence technology on the example of the experience of the UK, USA and the EU]. Zhurnal Suda po Intellektual’nym Pravam, (2), 34–45.Sinitsyn, I. N., Druzhinina, O. V., Belousov, V. V., Masina, O. N., & Petrov, A. A. (2019). Opyt razrabotki instrumental’no-metodicheskogo obespecheniya dlya resheniya zadach modelirovaniya nelinejnyh upravlyaemyh sistem s primeneniem tekhnologij mashinnogo obucheniya i otechestvennyh programmno-apparatnyh sredstv [Development of methodological tools for modeling nonlinear control systems using machine learning technologies and domestic software/hardware solutions]. Nelinejnyj mir, 4(17), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.18127/j20700970-201903-06Sinitsyn, I. N., Druzhinina, O. V., Belousov, V. V., Masina, O. N., & Petrov, A. A. (2019). Opyt razrabotki instrumental’no-metodicheskogo obespecheniya dlya resheniya zadach modelirovaniya nelinejnyh upravlyaemyh sistem s primeneniem tekhnologij mashinnogo obucheniya i otechestvennyh programmno-apparatnyh sredstv [Development of methodological tools for modeling nonlinear control systems using machine learning technologies and domestic software/hardware solutions]. Nelinejnyj mir, 4(17), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.18127/j20700970-201903-06Slobodyan, S. (2012). O pravovyh osnovaniyah priznaniya proizvedeniya ob”ektom avtorskogo prava [On the legal grounds for recognizing a work as subject to copyright protection]. Khozyajstvo i Pravo, 2, 91–99.Slobodyan, S. (2012). O pravovyh osnovaniyah priznaniya proizvedeniya ob”ektom avtorskogo prava [On the legal grounds for recognizing a work as subject to copyright protection]. Khozyajstvo i Pravo, 2, 91–99.Timofeev, A. A. (2010). Opredelenie kriteriev tvorchestva v proizvedeniyakh periodicheskoj pechati [Defining creativity criteria in periodical publications]. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 10 “Zhurnalistika”, (3), 172–186.Timofeev, A. A. (2010). Opredelenie kriteriev tvorchestva v proizvedeniyakh periodicheskoj pechati [Defining creativity criteria in periodical publications]. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 10 “Zhurnalistika”, (3), 172–186.Tiunova, A. I. (2021). Informacionnaya i tvorcheskaya sostavlyayushchie ob”ektov avtorskih prav: Sootnoshenie i znachenie dlya svobodnogo ispol’zovaniya [The informational and creative components of copyright objects: Correlation and significance for fair use]. Zhurnal Suda po Intellektual’nym Pravam, (3), 169–177.Tiunova, A. I. (2021). Informacionnaya i tvorcheskaya sostavlyayushchie ob”ektov avtorskih prav: Sootnoshenie i znachenie dlya svobodnogo ispol’zovaniya [The informational and creative components of copyright objects: Correlation and significance for fair use]. Zhurnal Suda po Intellektual’nym Pravam, (3), 169–177.Tsymbalova, Y. U. (2020). Avtorskoe pravo na proizvedeniya, sozdannye komp’yuternymi programmami [Copyright in works created by computer programs]. In Intellektual’nye prava: Sbornik rabot vypusknikov RShChP, posvyashchennyj 90-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya Viktora Abramovicha Dozorceva. Statut.Tsymbalova, Y. U. (2020). Avtorskoe pravo na proizvedeniya, sozdannye komp’yuternymi programmami [Copyright in works created by computer programs]. In Intellektual’nye prava: Sbornik rabot vypusknikov RShChP, posvyashchennyj 90-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya Viktora Abramovicha Dozorceva. Statut.Yatsenko, L. V. (2010). Tvorchestvo [Creative work]. In Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences, National Social Science Foundation, V. S. Stepin (Eds.). Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya [New Philosophical Encyclopedia] (Vol. 1–4, 2-nd rev. ed.). Mysl’. https://iphlib.ru/library/collection/newphilenc/document/HASH01089445249fc349f1553108.Yatsenko, L. V. (2010). Tvorchestvo [Creative work]. In Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences, National Social Science Foundation, V. S. Stepin (Eds.). Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya [New Philosophical Encyclopedia] (Vol. 1–4, 2-nd rev. ed.). Mysl’. https://iphlib.ru/library/collection/newphilenc/document/HASH01089445249fc349f1553108.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.