dirightDigital Law JournalЦифровое право2686-9136Maxim Inozemtsev10.38044/2686-9136-2024-5-2-24-39diright-226Research ArticleARTICLESСТАТЬИBalancing the interests of users, publishers and developers in cases of shutdown of video games: A new European initiativeБаланс интересов пользователей, издателей и разработчиков при закрытии видеоигр в свете новой европейской инициативыhttps://orcid.org/0009-0001-8360-2140ГрафД. В.GrafD. V.

магистрант международно-правового факультета

119454, Москва, пр. Вернадского, 76 

Denis V. Graf — Master Student (LL.M.), International Law Faculty

76, ave. Vernadsky, Moscow, 119454 

den29graf2002@gmail.comМосковский государственный институт международных отношений (университет) МИД РоссииРоссияMoscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO-University)Russian Federation202406032025522439Copyright © Graf D.V., 20252025Граф Д.В.Graf D.V.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.digitallawjournal.org/jour/article/view/226

When purchasing a game, users assume that they will have ongoing unlimited access to the product—a notion that does not always correspond to reality. The nature of the relationship between publishers, developers and users as expressed in opaque licensing documentation often leaves the latter uncertain about their rights and does not guarantee them stable access to the game, which can be revoked at any time. This imbalance gives grounds to view the current regulatory framework as not entirely fair. The present study is based on statutory acts and user agreements that govern the relationship between publishers and users in cases of shutdown of gaming projects. Particular attention is paid to the analysis of the European citizens’ initiative “Stop destroying videogames,” which calls for ensuring the functionality of games even after developer support has ceased. The aim of the study is to identify concrete methods for resolving the conflict of interests between publishers, developers, and users in the event of a game closure. Through an analysis of the aforementioned initiative, an evaluation of its merits and shortcomings, and a systematic comparison with statutory acts in the fields of copyright and consumer protection, it has been determined that, despite its limited restriction of the freedom of contract and the intellectual property rights of developers and publishers, the initiative contributes to achieving an effective balance of the rights and interests of all parties. Based on the study’s findings, the author concludes that it is fair to impose a number of obligations on publishers and developers. These obligations include, for example, the removal of technical measures for copyright protection, which are implemented via connections to the developer’s servers, the permission for private server hosting, and the alteration of the game distribution model, as well as compensating users for part of their expenses in the event of the closure of games in early access.

Приобретая игру, пользователи полагают, что им будет обеспечен не ограниченный каким-либо сроком доступ к продукту, что не всегда соответствует реальности. Зачастую непрозрачный лицензионный характер отношений между издателями и пользователями оставляет последних в неуверенности относительно их прав и не гарантирует им стабильность доступа к игре, которая может быть в любой момент закрыта. Такой дисбаланс вызывает основания полагать действующее регулирование не вполне справедливым. Эмпирическую основу исследования составляют нормативно-правовые акты и пользовательские соглашения, регулирующие отношения между издателями и пользователями при закрытии игровых проектов. Особое внимание уделяется анализу европейской гражданской инициативы «Stop destroying videogames», призывающей обеспечить функциональность игр даже после прекращения их поддержки. Цель исследования — выявить конкретные способы разрешения конфликта интересов между издателями, разработчиками и пользователями в случае закрытия игры. Посредством анализа указанной инициативы, оценки ее достоинств и недостатков, системного сравнения с актами в сфере авторского права и защиты прав потребителей было установлено, что, несмотря на ограниченное посягательство на свободу договора и интеллектуальные права разработчиков и издателей, указанная инициатива способствует достижению эффективного баланса прав и интересов всех сторон. По результатам исследования автор приходит к выводу о справедливости наложения на издателей и разработчиков ряда обязанностей, среди которых, например, удаление технических средства защиты авторских прав, которые реализуются за счет подключения к серверам разработчика, дозволение частного хостинга серверов и изменение модели распространения игр, а также компенсация части затрат пользователей в случае закрытия игр в раннем доступе.

лицензионный договорзакрытие игрпользовательские соглашенияевропейская гражданская инициативавидеоигрыавторское правоlicense agreementshutdown of gamesUser agreementsEuropean Citizens’ Initiativevideo gamescopyrightReferencesAbramovitch, S. H. (2007). Virtual property, real law: The regulation of property in video games. Canadian Journal of Law and Technology, 6(2), Article 2.Abramovitch, S. H. (2007). Virtual property, real law: The regulation of property in video games. Canadian Journal of Law and Technology, 6(2), Article 2.Andrianova, M. A., & Vlasenko, E. V. (2020). Riski provajdera, svyazannye s neopredelennost’yu pravovoj prirody pol’zovatel’skih soglashenij onlajn-igr [Provider risks connected with uncertainty in the legal nature of online games’ terms of use]. Digital Law Journal, 1(3), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.38044/2686-9136-2020-13-21-39Andrianova, M. A., & Vlasenko, E. V. (2020). Riski provajdera, svyazannye s neopredelennost’yu pravovoj prirody pol’zovatel’skih soglashenij onlajn-igr [Provider risks connected with uncertainty in the legal nature of online games’ terms of use]. Digital Law Journal, 1(3), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.38044/2686-9136-2020-13-21-39Dubois, L.-E., & Weststar, J. (2022). Games-as-a-service: Conflicted identities on the new front-line of video game development. New Media & Society, 24(10), 2332–2353. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444821995815Dubois, L.-E., & Weststar, J. (2022). Games-as-a-service: Conflicted identities on the new front-line of video game development. New Media & Society, 24(10), 2332–2353. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444821995815Fairfield, J. (2005). Virtual Property. Boston University Law Review, 85, 1047–1102.Fairfield, J. (2005). Virtual Property. Boston University Law Review, 85, 1047–1102.Harkai, I. (2022). Preservation of video games and their role as cultural heritage. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 17(10), 844–856. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpac090Harkai, I. (2022). Preservation of video games and their role as cultural heritage. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 17(10), 844–856. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpac090King, D. L., Delfabbro, P. H., Billieux, J., & Potenza, M. N. (2020). Problematic online gaming and the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 9(2), 184–186. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2020.00016King, D. L., Delfabbro, P. H., Billieux, J., & Potenza, M. N. (2020). Problematic online gaming and the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 9(2), 184–186. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2020.00016Lastowka, F. G. G., & Hunter, D. (2004). The laws of the virtual worlds. California Law Review, 92(1), 1–74.Lastowka, F. G. G., & Hunter, D. (2004). The laws of the virtual worlds. California Law Review, 92(1), 1–74.Lau, P. L. (2024). Disrupting MMORPGs gaming: Exploring and renegotiating end-user license agreements in the Metaverse. International Journal of Commerce and Contracting, 8(1–2), 65–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/20555636241246188Lau, P. L. (2024). Disrupting MMORPGs gaming: Exploring and renegotiating end-user license agreements in the Metaverse. International Journal of Commerce and Contracting, 8(1–2), 65–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/20555636241246188Lee, Y. H. (2018). Making videogame history: Videogame preservation and copyright law. Interactive Entertainment Law Review, 1(2), 103–108. https://doi.org/10.4337/ielr.2018.02.03Lee, Y. H. (2018). Making videogame history: Videogame preservation and copyright law. Interactive Entertainment Law Review, 1(2), 103–108. https://doi.org/10.4337/ielr.2018.02.03Lehtonen, M. J., Vesa, M., & Harviainen, J. T. (2022). Games-as-a-Disservice: Emergent value co-destruction in platform business models. Journal of Business Research, 141, 564–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.055Lehtonen, M. J., Vesa, M., & Harviainen, J. T. (2022). Games-as-a-Disservice: Emergent value co-destruction in platform business models. Journal of Business Research, 141, 564–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.055Limpach, O. (2020). The Publishing Challenge for Independent Video Game Developers: A Practical Guide (1st ed.). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780367815639Limpach, O. (2020). The Publishing Challenge for Independent Video Game Developers: A Practical Guide (1st ed.). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780367815639Medvedev, A.I. (2018). Pravovye otnosheniya v prostranstve virtual’nyh igrovyh mirov: Problemy teorii i praktiki [Legal relations in the space of virtual game worlds: Problems of theory and practice]. Vestnik Sibirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii [Vestnik of the Siberian Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia], (2 (31)), 139–150.Medvedev, A.I. (2018). Pravovye otnosheniya v prostranstve virtual’nyh igrovyh mirov: Problemy teorii i praktiki [Legal relations in the space of virtual game worlds: Problems of theory and practice]. Vestnik Sibirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii [Vestnik of the Siberian Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia], (2 (31)), 139–150.Mezei, P., & Harkai, I. (2022). End-user flexibilities in digital copyright law — an empirical analysis of end-user license agreements. Interactive Entertainment Law Review, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.4337/ielr.2022.0003Mezei, P., & Harkai, I. (2022). End-user flexibilities in digital copyright law — an empirical analysis of end-user license agreements. Interactive Entertainment Law Review, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.4337/ielr.2022.0003Newman, J. (2018). The music of microswitches: Preserving videogame sound—a proposal. The Computer Games Journal, 7(4), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40869-018-0065-8Newman, J. (2018). The music of microswitches: Preserving videogame sound—a proposal. The Computer Games Journal, 7(4), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40869-018-0065-8Oprysk, L. (2021). Digital consumer contract law without prejudice to copyright: EU digital content directive, reasonable consumer expectations and competition. GRUR International, 70(10), 943–956. https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikab058Oprysk, L. (2021). Digital consumer contract law without prejudice to copyright: EU digital content directive, reasonable consumer expectations and competition. GRUR International, 70(10), 943–956. https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikab058Rozhkova, M. A. (2020). Imushchestvennye prava na novye nematerial’nye ob”ekty v sisteme absolyutnykh prav [Property rights to new intangible objects in the system of absolute rights]. In M. A. Rozhkova (Ed.), Pravo cifrovoj ekonomiki—2020: Ezhegodnik-antologiya [Law of the Digital Economy—2020: A Yearbook-Anthology] (pp. 5–78). Statut.Rozhkova, M. A. (2020). Imushchestvennye prava na novye nematerial’nye ob”ekty v sisteme absolyutnykh prav [Property rights to new intangible objects in the system of absolute rights]. In M. A. Rozhkova (Ed.), Pravo cifrovoj ekonomiki—2020: Ezhegodnik-antologiya [Law of the Digital Economy—2020: A Yearbook-Anthology] (pp. 5–78). Statut.Saveliev, A. I. (2014). Pravovaya priroda virtual’nyh ob”ektov, priobretaemyh za real’nye den’gi v mnogopol’zovatel’skih igrah [Legal nature of virtual objects purchased for real money in multiplayer online games]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava [Civil Law Review], 14(1), 127–150.Saveliev, A. I. (2014). Pravovaya priroda virtual’nyh ob”ektov, priobretaemyh za real’nye den’gi v mnogopol’zovatel’skih igrah [Legal nature of virtual objects purchased for real money in multiplayer online games]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava [Civil Law Review], 14(1), 127–150.Wiśniewska, K., & Pałka, P. (2024). The impact of the Digital Content Directive on online platforms’ Terms of Service. Yearbook of European Law, 42, 388–406. https://doi.org/10.1093/yel/yead004Wiśniewska, K., & Pałka, P. (2024). The impact of the Digital Content Directive on online platforms’ Terms of Service. Yearbook of European Law, 42, 388–406. https://doi.org/10.1093/yel/yead004

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.