dirightDigital Law JournalЦифровое право2686-9136Maxim Inozemtsev10.38044/2686-9136-2024-5-1-94-104diright-219Research ArticleREVIEW ARTICLESОБЗОРНЫЕ СТАТЬИPublic Management Modernization Paths: A Critical Narrative Review of Digital Government and Good GovernanceЦифровое государство и Хорошее Управление: цифровизация и оптимизация как два пути модернизации государственного управленияhttps://orcid.org/0009-0008-2797-2041ЩенниковаИ. И.ShchennikovaI. I.

Щенникова И.И. — кандидат юридических наук, LL.M, преподаватель кафедры правовой информатики, информационного и цифрового права, юридический факультет;  преподаватель Департамента права цифровых технологий и биоправа, юридический факультет

119991, Москва, Ленинские горы, 1/13; 109028, Москва, Большой Трехсвятительский пер., 3

Inna I. Shchennikova — Ph.D. in Law, LL.M., Lecturer, Department of Legal Informatics, Information and DigitalLaw, Faculty of Law; Lecturer, Department of Digital Law and BioLaw, Faculty of Law

1/13, Leninskie gory str., Moscow, 119991; 3, Bolshoi Trekhsviatitelskii pereulok, Moscow, 109028 

shchennikova@hse.ruМГУ им. М.В. Ломоносова; Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»РоссияMoscow State University; National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE University)Russian Federation2024220120255194104Copyright © Shchennikova I.I., 20252025Щенникова И.И.Shchennikova I.I.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.digitallawjournal.org/jour/article/view/219

Digitalization has not only transformed economy, society and day-to-day routine of individuals, but also has given the government a unique opportunity to keep its sovereignty and power in an ever-changing world provided that the government is open to innovations and digital technologies implementation. Such openness should be confirmed by the willingness to be changed and optimized in order to increase public management efficiency. There are two basic models for optimizing public management: New Public Management and Good Governance. Transfer to a more advanced model of public management — Good Governance — is carried out in parallel with the digitalization of public management and formation of a digital government. The only one way to define the concepts of “digital government”, “Good Governance”, to establish effective legal framework of the relationships in this regard and to identify the reasons why these concepts should be implemented in public management is, on the one hand, to highlight basic principles they are based on, and, on the other hand, to outline essential features of both concepts. 

Настоящая статья посвящена анализу моделей оптимизации государственного управления и общественных отношений, формирующихся в результате такой оптимизации и требующих особого правового внимания. Автор делает вывод о том, что переход к более совершенной модели государственного управления — Good Governance, или Хорошее Управление — осуществляется параллельно с цифровизацией государственного управления, формированием цифрового государства и права. Автор дает определения понятиям «оптимизация», «цифровизация», «электронное правительство», «цифровое государство», выделяет основные принципы, которые являются фундаментом как для Хорошего Управления, так и для цифрового государства, а также описывает их сущностные признаки. 

оптимизацияинформатизацияцифровизацияцифровое государствоконцепция «Хорошего Управления»цифровые технологииoptimizationdigitalizationelectronic governmentdigital governmentGood Governancedigital technologiesReferencesBachilo, I. L. (2012). Gosudarstvo i pravo XXI v. Real’noye i virtual’noye [State and Law of the XXI century. Real and virtual]. Yurkompani.Bachilo, I. L. (2012). Gosudarstvo i pravo XXI v. Real’noye i virtual’noye [State and Law of the XXI century. Real and virtual]. Yurkompani.Chen, H., Brandt, L., Gregg, V., Traunmüller, R., Dawes, S., Hovy, E., Macintosh, A., & Larson, C. A. (Eds.). (2007). Digital government: E-government research, case studies, and implementation. Springer.Chen, H., Brandt, L., Gregg, V., Traunmüller, R., Dawes, S., Hovy, E., Macintosh, A., & Larson, C. A. (Eds.). (2007). Digital government: E-government research, case studies, and implementation. Springer.Chernogor, N. N., & Pashentsev, D. A. (Eds.). (2024). Kontseptsiya tsifrovogo gosudarstva i tsifrovoy pravovoy sredy [The concepts of digital state and digital legal environment]. Norma INFRA-M.Chernogor, N. N., & Pashentsev, D. A. (Eds.). (2024). Kontseptsiya tsifrovogo gosudarstva i tsifrovoy pravovoy sredy [The concepts of digital state and digital legal environment]. Norma INFRA-M.Dmitrik, N. A. (2022). Pravovaya informatika [Legal informatics]. Infotropic.Dmitrik, N. A. (2022). Pravovaya informatika [Legal informatics]. Infotropic.Fedoseyeva, N. N., & Chaykovskaya, M. A. (2011). Ponyatiye i sushchnost’ kontseptsii elektronnogo gosudarstva [The concept and essence of the e-government concept]. Rossiyskaya Yustitsiya [Russian Justice], 11, 6–10.Fedoseyeva, N. N., & Chaykovskaya, M. A. (2011). Ponyatiye i sushchnost’ kontseptsii elektronnogo gosudarstva [The concept and essence of the e-government concept]. Rossiyskaya Yustitsiya [Russian Justice], 11, 6–10.Gritsenko, E. V. (2022). Pravo na khorosheye upravleniye v usloviyakh tsifrovoy transformatsii [The right to good governance in digital transformation]. Sravnitel’noye Konstitutsionnoye Obozreniye [Comparative Constitutional Review], 4 (149), 15–36. https://doi.org/10.21128/1812-7126-2022-4-15-36Gritsenko, E. V. (2022). Pravo na khorosheye upravleniye v usloviyakh tsifrovoy transformatsii [The right to good governance in digital transformation]. Sravnitel’noye Konstitutsionnoye Obozreniye [Comparative Constitutional Review], 4 (149), 15–36. https://doi.org/10.21128/1812-7126-2022-4-15-36Inozemtsev, M. I. (2021). Digital law: The pursuit of certainty. Digital Law Journal, 2(1), 8–28. https://doi.org/10.38044/2686-9136-2021-2-1-8-28Inozemtsev, M. I. (2021). Digital law: The pursuit of certainty. Digital Law Journal, 2(1), 8–28. https://doi.org/10.38044/2686-9136-2021-2-1-8-28Inshakova, E. G. (2014). ‘Elektronnoye pravitel’stvo’: Problemy ponimaniya, formirovaniye organizatsionnoy struktury i prakticheskoye znacheniye v sisteme gosudarstvennogo upravleniya [“E-government”: Problems of understanding, formation of organizational structure and practical significance in the system of public administration]. Pravovaya Nauka i Reforma Yuridicheskogo Obrazovaniya [Legal Science and Legal Education Reform], 4 (27), 125–131.Inshakova, E. G. (2014). ‘Elektronnoye pravitel’stvo’: Problemy ponimaniya, formirovaniye organizatsionnoy struktury i prakticheskoye znacheniye v sisteme gosudarstvennogo upravleniya [“E-government”: Problems of understanding, formation of organizational structure and practical significance in the system of public administration]. Pravovaya Nauka i Reforma Yuridicheskogo Obrazovaniya [Legal Science and Legal Education Reform], 4 (27), 125–131.Inshakova, E. G. (2017). Elektronnoye pravitel’stvo v publichnom upravlenii [E-government in public administration]. Yurayt.Inshakova, E. G. (2017). Elektronnoye pravitel’stvo v publichnom upravlenii [E-government in public administration]. Yurayt.Kiryushin, S., Borisov, E., & Opredelenov, V. V. (Eds.). (2022). Uchebnik 4CDTO. O tsifrovoy transformatsii i tsifrovizatsii [4CDTO manual. On digital transformation and digitalization]. n.d. 4cdto.4cio.Kiryushin, S., Borisov, E., & Opredelenov, V. V. (Eds.). (2022). Uchebnik 4CDTO. O tsifrovoy transformatsii i tsifrovizatsii [4CDTO manual. On digital transformation and digitalization]. n.d. 4cdto.4cio.Korotkov, A. V., Kristalʹnyj, B. V., & Kurnosov, I. N. (2007). Gosudarstvennaya politika Rossiyskoy Federatsii v oblasti razvitiya informatsionnogo obshchestva [State policy of the Russian Federation in the field of information society development]. Treyn.Korotkov, A. V., Kristalʹnyj, B. V., & Kurnosov, I. N. (2007). Gosudarstvennaya politika Rossiyskoy Federatsii v oblasti razvitiya informatsionnogo obshchestva [State policy of the Russian Federation in the field of information society development]. Treyn.Kovaleva, N. N. (2014). Administrativno-pravovoye regulirovaniye ispol’zovaniya informatsionnykh tekhnologiy v gosudarstvennom upravlenii [Administrative and legal regulation of the use of information technologies in public administration] [Ph.D. Thesis Summary, Saratov State Law Academy]. https://new-disser.ru/_avtoreferats/01005098289.pdf?ysclid=ly5trs563n246600681Kovaleva, N. N. (2014). Administrativno-pravovoye regulirovaniye ispol’zovaniya informatsionnykh tekhnologiy v gosudarstvennom upravlenii [Administrative and legal regulation of the use of information technologies in public administration] [Ph.D. Thesis Summary, Saratov State Law Academy]. https://new-disser.ru/_avtoreferats/01005098289.pdf?ysclid=ly5trs563n246600681Mikhaylov, A. V. (2022). Tsifrovizatsiya i pravo [Digitalization and the law]. Uchebno-Metodicheskiy Tsentr Federal’noy Antimonopol’noy Sluzhby [Training and Methodological Center of the Federal Antimonopoly Service].Mikhaylov, A. V. (2022). Tsifrovizatsiya i pravo [Digitalization and the law]. Uchebno-Metodicheskiy Tsentr Federal’noy Antimonopol’noy Sluzhby [Training and Methodological Center of the Federal Antimonopoly Service].Nozdrachev, A. F. (2014). Sovremennaya pravotvorcheskaya deyatel’nost’ federal’nykh organov ispolnitel’noy vlasti: Analiz praktiki, otsenka pravovykh form, predlozheniya i rekomendatsii [Modern lawmaking activities of federal executive authorities: Analysis of practice, evaluation of legal forms, proposals and recommendations]. Zakonodatel’stvo i Ekonomika [Legislation and Economics], 10, 7–47.Nozdrachev, A. F. (2014). Sovremennaya pravotvorcheskaya deyatel’nost’ federal’nykh organov ispolnitel’noy vlasti: Analiz praktiki, otsenka pravovykh form, predlozheniya i rekomendatsii [Modern lawmaking activities of federal executive authorities: Analysis of practice, evaluation of legal forms, proposals and recommendations]. Zakonodatel’stvo i Ekonomika [Legislation and Economics], 10, 7–47.Parks, W. (1957). The Open Government Principle: Applying the Right to Know under the Constitution. The George Washington Law Review, 26(1), 1–22.Parks, W. (1957). The Open Government Principle: Applying the Right to Know under the Constitution. The George Washington Law Review, 26(1), 1–22.Ponkin, I. V. (2021). Kontsept tsifrovogo gosudarstva: Ponyatiye, priroda, struktura i ontologiya [The concept of the digital state: Definition, nature, structure, and ontology]. Gosudarstvennaya Sluzhba [Public Service], 23(5), 47–52.Ponkin, I. V. (2021). Kontsept tsifrovogo gosudarstva: Ponyatiye, priroda, struktura i ontologiya [The concept of the digital state: Definition, nature, structure, and ontology]. Gosudarstvennaya Sluzhba [Public Service], 23(5), 47–52.Smorgunov, L. V. (2007). Ot electronnogo gosudarstva k electronnomu pravleniyu: Smena paradigmi [From e-government to e-governance: Change of paradigm]. Politicheskaya Nauka [Political Science], (4), 20–49.Smorgunov, L. V. (2007). Ot electronnogo gosudarstva k electronnomu pravleniyu: Smena paradigmi [From e-government to e-governance: Change of paradigm]. Politicheskaya Nauka [Political Science], (4), 20–49.Talapina, E. V. (2015). Gosudarstvennoye upravleniye v informatsionnom obshchestve. Pravovoy aspekt [Public administration in the information society. Legal aspect]. Yurisprudentsiya [Jurisprudence].Talapina, E. V. (2015). Gosudarstvennoye upravleniye v informatsionnom obshchestve. Pravovoy aspekt [Public administration in the information society. Legal aspect]. Yurisprudentsiya [Jurisprudence].Vedel, T. (2006). The idea of electronic democracy: Origins, visions and questions. Parliamentary Affairs, 59(2), 226–235. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsl005Vedel, T. (2006). The idea of electronic democracy: Origins, visions and questions. Parliamentary Affairs, 59(2), 226–235. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsl005Volkov, V. E. (2022). Tsifrovoye pravo: Obshchaya chast’. Izdatel’stvo Samarskogo Universiteta [Samara University Publishing].Volkov, V. E. (2022). Tsifrovoye pravo: Obshchaya chast’. Izdatel’stvo Samarskogo Universiteta [Samara University Publishing].

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.