<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">diright</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Digital Law Journal</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Цифровое право</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2686-9136</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Maxim Inozemtsev</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.38044/2686-9136-2022-3-3-43-57</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">diright-116</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ARTICLES</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>СТАТЬИ</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Artificial intelligence and human rights: What is the EU’s approach?</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Искусственный интеллект и права человека: что предлагает Европейский союз?</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1601-7432</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Марченко</surname><given-names>А. Ю.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Marchenko</surname><given-names>A. Y.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>аспирант кафедры европейского права,</p><p>119454, Москва, просп. Вернадского, 76</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>76, ave. Vernadsky, Moscow, 119454</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">anna.yur.marchenko@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9562-8340</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Энтин</surname><given-names>М. Л.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Entin</surname><given-names>M. L.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>доктор юридических наук, профессор, заведующий кафедрой европейского права,</p><p>119454, Москва, просп. Вернадского, 76</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>76, ave. Vernadsky, Moscow, 119454</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">entinmark@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Московский государственный институт международных отношений (МГИМО-Университет) МИД России</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO-University)</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2022</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>02</day><month>10</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>3</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>43</fpage><lpage>57</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Marchenko A.Y., Entin M.L., 2022</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2022</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Марченко А.Ю., Энтин М.Л.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Marchenko A.Y., Entin M.L.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.digitallawjournal.org/jour/article/view/116">https://www.digitallawjournal.org/jour/article/view/116</self-uri><abstract><p>Threats posed to human rights by the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) are considered, along with some potential legal mitigations. The active efforts of the EU in the field of AI regulation seem particularly relevant for research considering its approach centred on citizens’ rights. Thus, the present study aims to describe the key features of the EU approach to regulating AI in the context of human rights protection, as well as identifying both its achievements and deficiencies, and proposing improvements to existing provisions. The presented analysis of the proposed AI Act pays special attention to provisions that set out to eliminate or mitigate the main risks and dangers of AI. The currently intensive development of AI regulation in the EU (the Presidency Compromise Text presented by the Council of the EU, amendments of the European Committee of the Regions, opinions of interested parties and human rights organisations, etc.) makes this study especially timely due to its highlighting of problematic aspects. The analysis shows that, on closer examination, the proposed law leaves many sensitive and controversial issues unsettled. In the context of AI applications, the proposed solution is considered as an emergency measure in order to rapidly integrate purportedly trustworthy AI into human society. As a result of the analysis, the authors propose potential improvements to the AI Act, including the possibility to update the lists of all types of AI, clarify the concept of transparency and eliminate the self-assessment procedure. It is also necessary to consider the potential reclassification of some AI systems currently defined as presenting limited risk as systems presenting considerable risk or prohibited systems. </p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Интенсивное развитие технологий обозначает серьезные правовые и этические проблемы, попытки решения которых предприняты в законодательстве ЕС. Статья обращает внимание на сферу прав человека. Рассмотрены риски применения технологий искусственного интеллекта для прав человека, а также возможные варианты их преодоления. Деятельность Европейского союза здесь представляется наиболее интересной с учетом его приверженности подходу к разработке «этичного», «доверенного» ИИ, где во главе угла стоят ценности ЕС и защита прав собственных граждан. Предпосылкой для проведения настоящего исследования является передовой характер подхода ЕС к регулированию ИИ и документов, разработанных Союзом в данной области. На примере предложенного Еврокомиссией Проекта регламента по регулированию ИИ в статье анализируются положения, которые позволяют купировать или снижать данные риски, и предлагаются пути для их улучшения. Ряд предложенных правил при ближайшем рассмотрении оставляет многие чувствительные и спорные вопросы открытыми. В контексте применения технологий ИИ их решение представляется крайне необходимым, с тем чтобы интегрировать безопасный, надежный ИИ в человеческое общество. Особенно интересным данный анализ представляется за счет динамичности развития регулирования — опубликованы компромиссный текст Совета ЕС, поправки Комитета ЕС по регионам, мнения заинтересованных сторон, правозащитных организаций и другие документы, позволяющие подсветить проблемные аспекты. В статье раскрыты особенности подхода ЕС, выявлены основные достижения и пробелы, сформулированы перспективы развития регулирования ИИ. </p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Европейский союз</kwd><kwd>право Европейского союза</kwd><kwd>искусственный интеллект</kwd><kwd>правовое регулирование ИИ</kwd><kwd>европейский подход</kwd><kwd>права человека</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>European Union</kwd><kwd>European Union law</kwd><kwd>artificial intelligence</kwd><kwd>legal regulation of AI</kwd><kwd>European approach</kwd><kwd>human rights</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Desai, D. R., &amp; Kroll, J. A. (2017). Trust but verify: A guide to algorithms and the law. Harvard Journal of Law &amp; Technology, 31, 1–64.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Desai, D. R., &amp; Kroll, J. A. (2017). Trust but verify: A guide to algorithms and the law. Harvard Journal of Law &amp; Technology, 31, 1–64.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Edwards, L., &amp; Veale, M. (2017). Slave to the algorithm? Why a ‘Right to an Explanation’ is probably not the remedy you are looking for. Duke Law and Technology Review, 16(1), 18–84. https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/dltr/vol16/iss1/2</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Edwards, L., &amp; Veale, M. (2017). Slave to the algorithm? Why a ‘Right to an Explanation’ is probably not the remedy you are looking for. Duke Law and Technology Review, 16(1), 18–84. https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/dltr/vol16/iss1/2</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Entin, M. L., &amp; Entina, E. G. (2021). V poiskah partnerskih otnoshenij — X: Rossiya i Evropejskij soyuz v 2020 — pervoj polovine 2021 godov. Zebra E.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Entin, M. L., &amp; Entina, E. G. (2021). Looking for partnership — X: Russia and the European Union in 2020 — the first half of 2021. Zebra E.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ferrer, X., Nuenen, T., Such, J. M., Coté, M., &amp; Criado, N. (2021). Bias and discrimination in AI: A cross-disciplinary perspective. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 40(2), 72–80. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2021.3056293</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ferrer, X., Nuenen, T., Such, J. M., Coté, M., &amp; Criado, N. (2021). Bias and discrimination in AI: A cross-disciplinary perspective. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 40(2), 72–80. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2021.3056293</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hacker, P. (2018). Teaching fairness to artificial intelligence: Existing and novel strategies against algorithmic discrimination under EU Law. Common Market Law Review, 55(4), 1143–1185. https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2018095</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hacker, P. (2018). Teaching fairness to artificial intelligence: Existing and novel strategies against algorithmic discrimination under EU Law. Common Market Law Review, 55(4), 1143–1185. https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2018095</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rodrigues, R. (2020). Legal and human rights issues of AI: Gaps, challenges and vulnerabilities. Journal of Responsible Technology, 4, Article 100005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2020.100005</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rodrigues, R. (2020). Legal and human rights issues of AI: Gaps, challenges and vulnerabilities. Journal of Responsible Technology, 4, Article 100005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2020.100005</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Samoili, S., López Cobo, M., Gómez, E., De Prato, G., Martínez-Plumed, F., &amp; Delipetrev, B. (2020). AI Watch defining artificial intelligence. Towards an operational definition and taxonomy of artificial intelligence. Joint Research Centre. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC118163</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Samoili, S., López Cobo, M., Gómez, E., De Prato, G., Martínez-Plumed, F., &amp; Delipetrev, B. (2020). AI Watch defining artificial intelligence. Towards an operational definition and taxonomy of artificial intelligence. Joint Research Centre. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC118163</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Siapka, A. (2018). The ethical and legal challenges of artificial intelligence: The EU response to biased and discriminatory AI. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3408773</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Siapka, A. (2018). The ethical and legal challenges of artificial intelligence: The EU response to biased and discriminatory AI. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3408773</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Stahl, B., Rodrigues, R., Santiago, N., &amp; Macnish, K. (2022). A European Agency for Artificial Intelligence: Protecting fundamental rights and ethical values. Computer Law &amp; Security Review, 45, Article 105661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105661</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Stahl, B., Rodrigues, R., Santiago, N., &amp; Macnish, K. (2022). A European Agency for Artificial Intelligence: Protecting fundamental rights and ethical values. Computer Law &amp; Security Review, 45, Article 105661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105661</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Stefano, V. (2018) “Negotiating the algorithm”: Automation, artificial intelligence and labour protection. Emloyment. Working Paper No. 246. International Labour Office, Geneva. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_emp/---emp_policy/documents/publication/wcms_634157.pdf</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Stefano, V. (2018) “Negotiating the algorithm”: Automation, artificial intelligence and labour protection. Emloyment. Working Paper No. 246. International Labour Office, Geneva. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/ public/---ed_emp/---emp_policy/documents/publication/wcms_634157.pdf</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
